Comment Re:Wait... (Score 0) 198
Wasn't the apple store supposed to be safe?
Isn't this one if the main lies Apple uses to convince their users to give up the freedom to install whatever app they want because only apps that are thoroughly checked by Apple are approved?
Agreed. Apple needs to pay this guy and whomever else is scammed like this back. After they do that, they can drop the lofty claims about how their walled garden is so safe and their software is checked because it isn't and it can't be. Nevertheless, Apple is making the claim, so they can take the consequences.
Comment Inevitable (Score 1) 48
Comment Re:Shame on them (Score 1) 208
Comment Don't stop here. (Score 3, Insightful) 53
Comment Obligatory... (Score 1) 20
Comment Re:Tax capital? (Score 1) 170
I'm pretty sure property tax is already a thing. Yes if your home appreciates in value to where you can no longer afford it, you sell it and get something smaller. And anyway, who should be paying taxes, the people without any assets? How does that make any sense?
Yes, and its bullshit. I think that was the point.
Comment It learned from GTA V! (Score 1) 232
Comment Re:Afraid to speak (Score 1) 459
Comment Re:The Great British Army (Score 1) 73
I think the DPRK could take them already.
Maybe. What I do know is that Chuck Norris could single handedly defeat France even if he were drunk and out of ammo.
Comment Soon thereafter... (Score 1) 95
Comment Re:Ok so this sounds like the best place on earth. (Score 1) 347
Submission + - SPAM: Windows.com Bitsquatting Hack Can Wreak 'Unknown Havoc' On PCs
Remy, as the researcher asked to be referred to, mapped the 32 valid domain names that were one bitflip away from windows.com. Of the 32 bit-flipped values that were valid domain names, Remy found that 14 of them were still available for purchase. This was surprising because Microsoft and other companies normally buy these types of one-off domains to protect customers against phishing attacks. He bought them for $126 and set out to see what would happen.
Over the course of two weeks, Remy’s server received 199,180 connections from 626 unique IP addresses that were trying to contact ntp.windows.com. By default, Windows machines will connect to this domain once per week to check that the time shown on the device clock is correct. What the researcher found next was even more surprising. “The NTP client for windows OS has no inherent verification of authenticity, so there is nothing stopping a malicious person from telling all these computers that it’s after 03:14:07 on Tuesday, 19 January 2038 and wreaking unknown havoc as the memory storing the signed 32-bit integer for time overflows,” he wrote in a post summarizing his findings. “As it turns out though, for ~30% of these computers doing that would make little to no difference at all to those users because their clock is already broken.”
Link to Original Source