I'm not sure that always holding drivers responsible for accidents with bikes in every situation is a good idea if you're at first trying to encourage cycling without a supporting infrastructure; it might be better to actually encourage better use of the roads on both sides before cycling is a common form of transportation in a particular area. While I've had a friend clipped a couple of times by cars (who often like to then just flee the scene), I've seen far more situations where the only reason the cyclist was not sent off of their bike was because of either sheer dumb luck or a particularly good set of brakes on the car that actually had the right of way (I usually see cyclists run a red light roughly once every week or two, and stop signs basically multiple times per day, regardless of what's actually happening at that intersection). Unfortunately with cycling as a main form of transportation being uncommon, while many drivers are unaware of how they should react many cyclists are also unaware of what they should be doing for basic safety and tend to treat riding on the road like riding on the sidewalk.
If my city had better bike lane coverage-- it isn't bad, but it's spotty and sometimes lazy-- it probably wouldn't be a bad idea, but when you're still at the point you need to be concerned about bikes going down the yellow between rows of cars (another thing I see not infrequently one some of the one-way streets) and speeding out into intersections from spots that are difficult to see from *both* sides of oncoming traffic I don't believe that sort of law would be appropriate. It's frustrating, though, when cyclists who are actually well-mannered and make excellent use of the don't seem to be getting the kind of protection (or respect from other cars) that they need.
A site I use (one which I would like to have a strong password) has an interesting system where they have very specific password requirements (uppercase, some numbers, letter, punctuation) which is all well and good... but then they only allow 8-12 characters. In the meantime, the username (which also requires a number in it, for some reason), is 6-20 characters.
I cannot fathom why they allow longer usernames but don't allow longer passwords.
Local brick and mortar stores already get my business far, far more often for one primary reason: convenience. OK, a second reason too: shipping costs often drive the cost of goods up to what an item would probably cost with a sales tax anyway. The time when it's really useful to buy an item online is when it's a generic item being sold without the massive markup certain things get in physical stores (cabling, I'm looking at you). Local small businesses have much more to fear from chain retailers than they do from the internet.
Sales tax is a particularly frustrating tax, as it's fairly regressive and I'd personally rather see property taxes and the like be the big way to raise money for local government. Unfortunately, my state is one of the states in which the voters shortsightedly decided to cap property taxes.
In the future, you're going to get computers as prizes in breakfast cereals. You'll throw them out because your house will be littered with them.