Yes, that's a bit more complex and one has to be specific what they talk about.
What I mean is, the contribution of AI to the GDP lies in the construction of data centers, not in a productivity gain caused by AI. And I believe the calculations according to which the US had nearly no other economic growth. This could mean that it is just wasted money spent on servers because of a hype.
It wasn't really "defect". It was designed for earth observations, because the telescope was just the facade for the KH-11 KENNEN spy satellite program. Because of that the focal length was minimally off.
I am just reading up a bit on this topic, and can't believe it.
All these companies had their own servers and data solutions in the past, keeping it all protected and to themselves.
But at some point they decided to put everything into the "cloud"
They are not meaningless. These internal payments justify if a system is kept running, if it is worth the effort, and if it would be better to buy the service elsewhere
Because it's one of the topics where the discussion turned completely black and white.
Chemtrail conspiracies are mostly nonsense. But weather control IS doable and real. It makes sense to regulate it, and not let some people and companies do what they want.
First of all they have to tell us how AI would justify the huge investments needed for this energy supply and for the servers. Until now they are all pretty far away from making a profit.