Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
Communications

COVID-19 Pushes Up Internet Use 70 Percent, Streaming More Than 12 Percent, First Figures Reveal (forbes.com) 32

An anonymous reader quotes a report from Forbes: The first internet streaming and usage figures are coming in as the coronavirus pandemic places a quarter of the world's population under lockdown. As millions of people go online for entertainment and more, total internet hits have surged by between 50% and 70%, according to preliminary statistics. Streaming has also jumped by at least 12%, estimates show. [Maria Rua Aguete of Omdia, the tech research arm of Informa Tech] said the annual figures are revealing: "Ecommerce will be the other sector that will see a revenue boost as a result of the pandemic, adding $175 billion in revenue in 2020, which represents a 5% increase."

Omdia predicts $11 billion losses for the movie industry with a 25% decline and a 15% drop in TV advertising, especially for ads promoting events such as concerts that can no longer take place. The surge in demand comes coupled with a warning from the company that paid TV advertising may decline by 15%. Omdia also predicted that industry recovery will start in 18 to 24 months. While official figures from Google's YouTube and other internet giants are awaited, Omdia's figures accord with other analysts. "Broadband providers are thus far experiencing a traffic surge between 30% and 50% across their mobile and fixed networks," said Alfonso Marone, who is head of media at KPMG U.K.: "Where self-isolation policies are at their peak in Europe, the spike in internet traffic has reached as high as 70%, which is indicative of what the traffic surge could look like in other regions in just two to three weeks' time. The most bandwidth-hungry are the online entertainment applications, especially those in high-definition like 4K movies and TV. For broadband providers, this spike may be seen as more a source of headache."

Comment The collection of data is the problem (Score 1) 103

I don't think the NSA sharing the data they collect is the problem. The
real problem lies in what data the NSA--as a government agency with
special powers--collects. Could making some of this more public be the
thing that finally leads to a change in the NSA's blanket surveillance
over citizens? (Actually, I'm not that hopeful.)

Input Devices

Lytro Announces World's First Light Field VR Camera 30

An anonymous reader writes: VR is easy for video games, but hard for live action: you don't know where the viewer will be in the virtual world, so you can't put the camera in the right place in the real world. Light field cameras are perfect for VR though, because they're essentially holographic, and capture lots of positions at once. And Lytro has announced the first system that's both 'light field' and 'holographic', which changes everything. Wired seems similarly excited.

Comment Re:Nope... Wrong interpretation. (Score 4, Insightful) 417

> I've heard stories from a technical director at a major American firm where they'd reject PHDs
> simply because they were worried they'd leave for higher paying jobs elsewhere.

Employers who think this way will ultimately hire the employees they deserve.

Pay is not the only thing that attracts a person to a job (or keeps them there). A person leaves
for a *better* job, which may or may not mean it offers higher pay.

Electronic Frontier Foundation

DOJ Often Used Cell Tower Impersonating Devices Without Explicit Warrants 146

Via the EFF comes news that, during a case involving the use of a Stingray device, the DOJ revealed that it was standard practice to use the devices without explicitly requesting permission in warrants. "When Rigmaiden filed a motion to suppress the Stingray evidence as a warrantless search in violation of the Fourth Amendment, the government responded that this order was a search warrant that authorized the government to use the Stingray. Together with the ACLU of Northern California and the ACLU, we filed an amicus brief in support of Rigmaiden, noting that this 'order' wasn't a search warrant because it was directed towards Verizon, made no mention of an IMSI catcher or Stingray and didn't authorize the government — rather than Verizon — to do anything. Plus to the extent it captured loads of information from other people not suspected of criminal activity it was a 'general warrant,' the precise evil the Fourth Amendment was designed to prevent. ... The emails make clear that U.S. Attorneys in the Northern California were using Stingrays but not informing magistrates of what exactly they were doing. And once the judges got wind of what was actually going on, they were none too pleased:"

Comment Re:Hmm (Score 1) 95

I predict that NONE of those surveyed will say "to be able to make phone calls"
either.

I think that security is something people don't think about very much, but they
also buy the phone with the assumption that *surely* it would be made secure,
("they would be fools sell it to millions of people if it were not secure").

And, to a reasonable extent they *are* made secure. But securing a device is a
process, not a one-time event. It is an ever-escalating back and forth between
having all known holes plugged and an intruder finding the next one (which is
presumably harder to find).

Comment Don't fool yourself (Score 1) 1

If you are a high quality developer, you want your code to be correct.
This means you are not threatened by a review finding bugs--you
*want* a review, so anything you missed gets found. The code you
check in under your name is something to take pride in, and you
don't want your commit to be the one with a bug in it.

That being said, my experience has been that most people don't
know how (or have the patience) to do a good, thorough review.
Time gets spent commenting (and arguing) about superficial things
rather than understanding and verifying meaning embedded in the
code under review.

It's unfortunate, because time spent doing a good code review is
*much* more productive than the aggregate time spent (by customers,
support, and ultimately developers) on bugs found in the field. The
cost of bugs rises incredibly quickly the later they are found.

So code review is very important, but (like code) if it's not done
well it's just not that valuable, and may do more harm than good.

Comment Re:Arguments for and against (Score 1) 660

If people are not keeping the comments in synch with
the code, *that* is the maintainability issue. Bad
comments (not concise, not informative, not clear)
may be harder to keep up-to-date, but that's not any
different from poorly-written code being hard to
understand or update.

Comments should be viewed as an intrinsic part of the
code--and if you change the machine-oriented part you
better be sure that the human-oriented part is updated
to reflect the change. And if necessary, improve the
comments while you're at it.

Sci-Fi

Ricardo Montalban Dead At 88 280

DesScorp writes "Ricardo Montalban, immortalized as Khan in the Star Trek franchise, is dead at age 88, passing at his Los Angeles home. Montalban had a long and successful career on television and film. The voice of Rich Corinthian Leather is silenced, but we still have the memories."

New MacBook Case Leak Rumors 243

Someone noted that there are more macbook case leaks which look to all but confirm a new MacBook and possibly a MacBook Pro expected to be announced for later this week. There seem to be fewer ports, and no leaks of a 17" aircraft carrier laptop.

Comment Re:Depends on function (Score 4, Interesting) 214

This is dead wrong. It's true that sometimes
purity is sacrificed for performance. But in
general, good clean code matches a good clean
design, which emerges when a problem is
well-understood. Even code that has been
tweaked to exploit certain compiler anomalies
can remain clean.

Slashdot Top Deals

You can't take damsel here now.

Working...