Comment We already have relevant laws, don't we? (Score 1) 142
You can already get certain kinds of data from your dashboard and in-car infotainment systems designed for the driver to use. We presumably have laws that specify what's legit (speed, radio, etc.,) and what's not (watching tv shows).
Can't we agree that if a HUD limits itself it what's already available, and is less distracting than the already approved alternative, then it's a win?
If it tries to do things that are illegal, then it's bad?
That assumes that the existing laws already do a reasonable job of win vs bad, but if they don't - fix the existing law - but a device like this seems no worse, if the gestures aren't more distracting than reaching for knobs/buttons.
If this device wants to do more than is legal in existing head units / dials / knobs then we have a legislative process to address that.
I had a rental with a HUD, and it seemed to me (FWIW) that it was less distracting to use that to see speed / nav directions on that then to take my eyes further from the road to look down at the speedo or center console video screen. YMMV.