"There are no appeals available, we have closed your application"
That's two sentences that should be separated by a period, not a comma.

Almost as much as an Android phone. Impressive!

"Clicking ahead" is not a practical solution. How far ahead should one click each time to stay on track with one of the schemes, not miss something important and not waste time viewing a different scheme? To be respectful of viewers, each scheme should have its own video, with perhaps a common, short introduction that describes the overall organization of the videos. 3+ hours is an absolute insult--as is /. posting this.

Oh, come on. The editor of this video interleaved clips from each ploy so you have to watch the whole 3+ hours to see any one ploy in its entirety? No, thanks.

Everybody already knew Patel is a dork. There'd be nothing to see even in his government email, because he's basically out to lunch and out of the loop.

How creeps like Zuckerberg thought they could sell nothingness for big money.

My ears function worse than they did in 1997, so I'm good with 48kHz.

Would you like your acai bowl with a shot of Mobile 1?

Get these massive complexes humming and the audible noise and infrasound may be simply unbearable at a distance of far more than 1k feet away, especially when "temporary" gas generators are installed, too.

LLMs are inherently language based--not great for randomness. How strong are passwords produced by generators written by Opus 4.6?

Opus 4.6 codes complex methods in minutes--nothing one would assign to a "code monkey", because it would take too long/cost too much. Opus 4.6 frees me from drudgery while providing the freedom to investigate avenues I'd otherwise never pursue and to do so quickly. Pursue your ideas--your dreams--and stop being a code monkey yourself.

Not financially invested in AI. I write complex, technical code and have done so for decades. And you haven't tried Opus 4.6, I know that for sure.

You don't get it. I don't blame you. Opus 4.6 is a huge advance that I still can't comprehend. Opus 4.6 is effortlessly in minutes writing code that I would never put time and effort into. I can experiment with algorithms and data layouts like never before--that were never practical before. It still takes knowledge to direct it, but far less effort. It's not perfect, but it's a LOT more accurate and builds test blocks and runs tests and edits its code all on its own. Prompts do not have to be carefully crafted anymore. I used to be like you--like everyone else here I believe--but the world changed on Feb. 5th.

Sorry to disappoint. I'm a real person, and I code for a living. I strongly suggest you read this opinion piece, which largely mirrors my experience the past 2 weeks. (It's overly long but you'll get the point not too far in.) If you've not tried Opus 4.6, you have no idea what just happened. (I've not tried Codex yet.)
https://shumer.dev/something-b...

You haven't tried Opus 4.6, right? Or you don't code for a living. I was like you... and then Feb. 5th.