Their catalog is a work of art. Even if you don't buy anything (But you should! It's cheap! And good!) it's really fun to read.

...that *Dimorphos* has now had *two shapes*? --I'll see myself out, but I'm here all week!

In particular, the last sentence of the abstract is telling: "This qualitative correlation would suggest that chip-scale experiments might be explored to attempt to measure tiny signatures illustrative of the presence of the conjectured phenomenon: a real, albeit humble, warp bubble." In other words (based on this and the rest of the paper) they saw something reminiscent of what you would expect to see if there was a tiny warp bubble. It would take a lot of work, with more focused experiments, to be able to convincingly show that this was actual evidence that there might be a tiny warp bubble (experiments which they are not going to do, which says something about what they think the likelihood is). It would then take a tremendous amount more work beyond that to actually convincingly show that it actually was a tiny warp bubble, and a tremendous amount more work beyond that to do anything at a non-microscopic scale.

Now that this is public knowledge, people can post any hate speech they want. "White men who aren't me suck!", for example. Or "women older than 1 are terrible people!"

Expecting to find positive results at a dilution of 1/1800 is not the homeopathic way. Positive results are diluted by approximately 10^-12 amidst the null results.

It's amusing how the telecoms can, when addressing consumers, really stress how important and amazing it is to have legitimately high bandwidth (e.g. Comcast telling me that I need at least 50 mbits downstream if more than one person lives in my home) and yet, when addressing regulators, say that most people don't need more than 4 mbits. Not surprising, but amusing. Do they think that regulators don't see their ads?

do what is more interesting to you. You will have more fun, and enjoy it more, and therefore probably be better at it. If/when money becomes an issue, being good at something that you love leaves you well positioned to leverage it to make more money. Being mediocre at something that you don't care much about is unlikely to be very lucrative. You can get valuable (demonstrable) experience by, for example, contributing to open-source projects. Showing that you're decent at programming is more important for most decent employers than showing that you've got any particular degree.

...whose principles actually seem pretty good to me. But I can imagine that people would start not-quite-graduating from college. Employers would realize that 7/8 of a college degree is almost as valuable as 8/8, and make accommodations for it. Of course there are ways around this (tax based on the number of classes you took?), but it detracts from the notion's superficial elegance. The ways around this could probably also be gamed.

Please note that many of the "right-wingers" got elected by GERRYMANDERING THEIR DISTRICTS, which is why there's a hefty Republican majority in the House despite the fact that a respectable majority of overall House votes went to Democrats. The American people are pretty much split right down the middle in terms of ideology (that respectably majority was respectable, not overwhelming). We are overwhelmingly in favor, however, of not shutting down government, of not having a dysfunctional congress, and of not playing childish hostage games with real consequences just to demonstrate displeasure with a passed law.

As they point out in the article, the tremendous bandwidth achieved does not include the logistics or time required to initially copy the data onto SD cards, and then back off of the cards upon reaching the destination. Still, beats a flock of parrots trained in Morse code.

Knives are freely and readily available in China. Why did none of the victims fight back and stab the perp?

Temperature, pressure, humidity, all under exquisite control and all potentially extreme.

Reading comments by internet posters about a story discussing bad grammar on the internet is truly delightful, from a certain point of view!

I'm a reasonably savvy internet shopper, capable of looking at newegg, tigerdirect, searching with google, browsing "hot deals" fora at e.g. anandtech, etc... I don't buy a whole lot, but I've found hard drives several times, a video card (Radeon 4890), and a flatscreen TV for less at my local Best Buy than I could anywhere mail-order. Not trying to say they're universally awesome or anything, just saying personally, I've had no reason to complain, and in a non-trivial number of cases they've been the best option (though in all fairness, if I *did* need a cheap keyboard or something, I'd probably rather spend $20 and six minutes going to Best Buy---it's pretty much on my way home from work---rather than $10 and four days and the environmental impact of a personalized shipment to my door from NewEgg)

I guess I'm in the minority, but I've actually got a pretty positive outlook on them. Most of the time, I can find what I'm looking for there, and it's often at a price competitive with the best I can find online. I've had employees range from friendly-but-incompetent to moderately helpful, and never overly pushy. They've always been extremely accommodating about returns, or about refunding me money when they drop the price on something shortly after I buy it. Maybe my local store is an exception, but if they were gone I would occasionally miss them.