Comment Re:Nope (Score 1) 231
(I think alot of ISPs in US try to make it difficult to stop services?)
Required by the FCC. We can't make a change to a customer's account without jumping through a number of hoops to verify the customer's identity and that the person requesting a change is authorized by the account owner. In the event of the death of a customer, we need either a copy of the customer's death certificate or a copy of the court documents giving control over the estate. So far as I know, and this has never come up at the company I work for, the FCC regulations don't include an exception when the company is responsible for the customer's death. Even personal knowledge of the customer's death isn't sufficient to transfer control over the account to another person who isn't already authorized on the account. Powers of Attorney aren't sufficient, either, as they terminate at the covered person's death.
So yeah, FCC regulations make it hard to terminate services. It's a result of the uproar a few years back from LD companies cramming new services onto local accounts, or fraudulently pretexting to misidentify a broker as the account holder.
Comment Re:No endurance test data? (Score 1) 91
Comment That's not an arm (Score 1) 51
Comment Re:Phone company liability... (Score 4, Informative) 71
Per FCC regulations, your phone company can NOT initiate a confirmation contact once a port-out has been initiated. If the account #'s, names, and security information are correct in the port-out request initiated by the new phone company, the old provider has no legal authority to question or verify the legitimacy of the port-out request and must complete the port-out within 24 hours or show good reason it could not technically be completed. And they are not allowed to contact you for any reason regarding the number port.
Comment The fuck are you talking about? (Score 1) 5
Comment Re:Mid City America (Score 1) 99
Comment Re:And the print option? (Score 2) 266
Comment Re:Who cares for their budget? (Score 1) 48
Comment Re:Who cares for their budget? (Score 1) 48
Comment Re:Unsurprising, really (Score 1) 223
This feigned or mistaken indignance over supposedly increasing state powers or the failings of modern pop culture is just sorely misplaced. There's no loss of privacy, there was never any privacy to begin with. It's just that now, the spread of information access to the masses give some awareness of the situation.