If you just blow up satellites with rockets, it will put debris into its orbit, drastically reducing the usability of the orbit for anyone.

If you build a weapon to simply disable the satellite, or better yet, cause it to drop out of orbit and burn up without hitting anything, then you would have an advantage. I hope that we are keeping tabs on anyone that plans to develop that kind of technology.

I cant imagine that China didn't learn their lesson from blowing up satellites.

By posting these excerpts, you just redistributed part of their source code without displaying the appropriate copyright notice in tact. You've violated the license agreement.

Since you are consulting us regarding TheNextBigThing(TM), we will now require 30% royalties on all revenue generated from TheNextBigThing(TM).

So we need MORE clouds? The Earth is already about 70% covered in clouds.

I think the Earth already does a pretty good job of putting water vapour into the atmosphere on a daily basis.

The cloud cover is in dynamic equilibrium. I don't think that spraying some water air changes that equilibrium. Because, like I said, it's already dynamic equilibrium!.

We need to find the Earth's thermostat and turn it down a bit. I think it has to do more with the composition of the atmosphere.

And 150 million of those users are bots.

Either that or facebook has tonnes of supermodels that have only two or three friends. ...not that I've been searching ;)