Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment A case in which the glasses are stored !!! (Score 1) 324

It comes with a case. But you can't fold the parts that go over the ears, so it is an awkward ase to carry with you.

More to the point for some of us, I have prescription lenses. Without them, I am not blind, but for any fine or detailed motor activity, I am useless. Without the Glass device, powered on or powered off, I can't see.

I am not taking my glasses off just to make you feel comfortable. I need them.

Comment Re:Less creepiness (Score 1) 324

Simple modification: move the camera to a ring on the wearer's finger.

People think Google Glass is creepy because the camera in on the headset and automatically points at whatever the wearer is looking at, and it's not at all obvious where the camera aperture is, or whether it is recordiing at any given moment.

Put the camera in a ring on the user's finger, with a Bluetooth connection to the headset. Have a physical cover that covers the lens the vast majority of the time. Now it will be really obvious that recording is not happening the vast majority of the time, but the wearer can still grab an image of almost anything they want at any time.

Creepiness gone.

Your ignorance is showing.

Except, it is obvious when there is activity on the device. It isn't going to be clear which of the activities it is possible to that is actually taking place.

The prism lights up.

Comment Re:Size (Score 1) 324

Hands free. It can take pictures and videos hands free. That is a very useful thing, and that is why it is there. And we both know if it wasn't, it would have sold less because someone would have wanted/needed a camera on it.

I took some video of debris falling off a truck all over a state highway. Captured the truck number and the company's phone number.

And I kept my hands on the wheel, too.

And later, when I was in a better position to, I called the company and shared the issue.

I could have done the same with a phone, except the keeping my hands on the wheel part. Or the keeping of my eyes on the road part.

Your hatred is irrational and illogical.

Comment Re:Size (Score 1) 324

It isn't. You just "fear" it is.

The prism lights up when "something" is happening with the device. It might be that it is starting up. Or it might be a notice from Vine that so-and-so just uploaded a 6-second video. Or it could be a notice of an SMS from your sister. Or an email to your Yahoo! account. Or your GMail account. Or somebody posted something to your Facebook wall.

Even though you won't know for sure which activity it is, you will be sure that there is activity. But that is it.

And by gosh, by gum, and by gollee, you're certain it's a picture being taken! A picture of you!

Argh! Insanity ensues!

Comment Re:Size (Score 1) 324

You may find it unacceptable, rude, or whatever. But photography is not a crime.

More importantly, just because I have the capability to take pictures, doesn't mean I am taking pictures.

So in effect, you want me banned from a public place. And you want me banned not because I am taking pictures, but because of the particular picture-taking device I have. I'm not to be banned because I have a cell phone with a camera, but because I have a Glass device with a camera.

That is so illogical that I'm laughing at you. Hell, my Glass device is laughing at you getting butt hurt over nothing.

That's a lot of dogma to carry around pal!!!

Comment Re:Cognitive Dissonance (Score 1) 324

You can't take a very good selfie with the Glass device. Well, maybe if you are looking in a mirror. But then in that case, I'm obviously not taking a picture of you.

It's also obvious when you're taking a picture or shooting a short video with a Glass device. (Or, at the least, that you're doing something with it.)

I think it's a little arrogant for anyone to assume that someone with a Glass device must obviously be taking pictures with it. And it's even more arrogant to presume that if I'm taking a picture, it's of you.

(shrug)

Comment Well first, it has to be unnoticeable. (Score 1) 324

Preferably in black, unstylish eyeglass frames.

I don't want to advertise the fact that I'm wearing this thing. Google geeks may think it's the coolest status symbol ever. I don't. And I don't care. I want to use the map feature, get the weather report.

Yes, I know it can give me automatic Yelp reports, tell me who and what's around, get me dates, show me movies and deliver specs on my computer by looking.

I could care less. I'll use the maps. And the weather. Maybe news, if I'm waiting for a bus. If they want me to buy it, it has to be cheap and boring.

You have seen the frames for those needing prescriptions right? Only the US Armed Forces RCGs were less fashionable.

As long as there is a screen to light up, then it will be noticeable to a degree, with or without a camera.

Comment If it fails, it's because of unfounded fear (Score 1) 324

So long as there are glassholes, google glass will not succeed.

.
Unfortunately, google cannot control the people who use google glass, so there will always be glassholes and google glass won't succeed.

As an explorer, my experience is that the real glasshole is the ignoramus who assumes something that is not in evidence.

For the record, I am not saying that some Explorers weren't assholes. There were. But way more people just plain over-reacted out of ignorance than had justification for their fear.

And in their fear and ignorance, they named an otherwise nice person a glasshole; they did so not because s/he was a glasshole, but because they wore a Glass device. And the Glass device was the talisman that generated their fear.

Slashdot Top Deals

Any programming language is at its best before it is implemented and used.

Working...