Comment Theft on the Net vs 'theft' by overinflated prices (Score 1) 208
<rant target="record companies"> OK, here's the main point of my post: the record companies themselves that charge such overinflated prices. I don't know what the situation is over in the US, but over here the prices of Albums and especially singles is manipuled by the record companies for the purpose of getting a track to #1 in the charts (they're done on single sales over here). Thus new singles usually cost less than older ones, just to boost sales. If record companies sold 'their' CDs for what they should cost (ie cost of production + fair royalties + distribution + advertising), rather than adding on such a huge markup, then people would buy far more music. I'm still in favour of MP3's, but not of heedless piracy (or whatever word you think I should use). Releasing perhaps 1 or 2 singles per album (and maybe previews of the rest - I know one local band that has a 'taster' track on their album which is a mix of snippets from all their tracks) for legitamite online distribution would mean that you could check out an album, see if you like it, and then go out and buy it. Well, before I run this post into too many thousands of words, I'll finish.</rant>
WireWolf
Thought for today: "Music is the voice of all sorrow, all joy. It needs no translation"
-- Helen Exley