Comment Re:Awesome! (Score 1) 409
When you're bored, you might want to give Eagle Mode a try.
Comment Re:Maaaaaan... (Score 1) 737
Comment Re:Not always true (Score 1) 214
Comment Re:Popcorn loaded, commence fanatical BS... (Score 1) 271
One, back up.
Two, see one.
Three, try extundelete <http://extundelete.sourceforge.net/>.
Two, see one.
Three, try extundelete <http://extundelete.sourceforge.net/>.
Comment Re:Surprise, surprise, surprise (Score 1) 162
#!/bin/bash
if [[ -z $1 ]]; then
echo "Usage: ${0##*/} (stop|start|restart) [daemon]"
exit 1
fi
if [[ -z $2 ]]; then
d=sarcasm
else
d=$2
fi
case $(</proc/1/comm) in
systemd)
systemctl $1 $d.service
;;
upstart)
service $d $1
;;
rinit)
sv $1 $d
;;
init)
for s in {rc,init}{.d,}; do
[[ -f /etc/$s/$d ]] && /etc/$s/$d $1
done
;;
*)
if [[ $1 == @(stop|restart) ]]; then
killall $d
for i in {0..5}; do
pidof $d &>/dev/null || break
done
[[ $? -eq 0 ]] && killall -9 $d
fi
if [[ $1 == @(start|restart) ]]; then
pidof $d &>/dev/null || $d -D
fi
;;
esac
if [[ $? -ne 0 ]]; then
echo "FATAL: Could not $1 $d service."
exit 1
fi
if [[ -z $1 ]]; then
echo "Usage: ${0##*/} (stop|start|restart) [daemon]"
exit 1
fi
if [[ -z $2 ]]; then
d=sarcasm
else
d=$2
fi
case $(</proc/1/comm) in
systemd)
systemctl $1 $d.service
upstart)
service $d $1
rinit)
sv $1 $d
init)
for s in {rc,init}{.d,}; do
[[ -f
done
*)
if [[ $1 == @(stop|restart) ]]; then
killall $d
for i in {0..5}; do
pidof $d &>/dev/null || break
done
[[ $? -eq 0 ]] && killall -9 $d
fi
if [[ $1 == @(start|restart) ]]; then
pidof $d &>/dev/null || $d -D
fi
esac
if [[ $? -ne 0 ]]; then
echo "FATAL: Could not $1 $d service."
exit 1
fi
Comment Why Is This a Bad Thing? (Score 1) 403
I do not understand the all the negativity behind the single-window mode, especially when it is an optional component and is not "forced upon" users without an alternative, save for using an older version for as long as it works and is maintained, waiting for or working on a fork, accepting the changes, or abandoning ship and seeking an alternative.
As a user of a keyboard-driven tiling window manager that does not completely follow the WIMP model, I find the option of using a single window mode to be a welcome change.
Comment Re:my usual practice (Score 3, Informative) 364
If you are using Firefox, try the Pentadactyl nightly or Vimperator.
Comment Re:Obvious (Score 1) 636
Comment Re:Who cares? Not Joe six-pack... (Score 1) 205
And Simple Adblock for the Internet Explorers, up to version nine.
Comment Re:sigh (Score 2, Informative) 223
This is not so much the job of Chrome as it is of GTK.
Have you tried making it use the GTK Qt engine [gtk-qt-engine]? That -- and setting Use System Title Bar and Borders -- will at least get Chrome to match your text and Qt engine style.
Comment Re:Who really built this thing? eMachines? (Score 1) 338
The "uptime" on this collider is worse than an application server running on Windows ME!
FTFY.
Comment Re:This is great ! (Score 1) 191
More importantly, can it handle Adobe Flash?
Comment Cursive writing... (Score 1) 857
...is dying with what seems to be the rest of the English language, as we once knew it.
Comment Re:How we would treat 'sub-humans' (Score 1) 554
How we would treat 'sub-humans'?
Make them live in the sewers, a la Futurama?