Comment Re:Look into the Constitution or the Swimsuit idea (Score 1) 248
I don't know if you were replying to my post or the initial post, but I was disagreeing with the above poster, and in essence agreeing with you. That being said, when the court ruled against the wheat farmer, it was basically asserting that even activity restricted to a farm, impacts interstate commerce. I agree with both this rationale and the decision. The original poster, who argued, that since nano tech did not "touch" interstate commerce was beyond scope of the Constitution and thus beyond the ability of Congress to regulate it, has a view of constitutional law that predates 1933.
Regards
Winston