Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re:Mars? (Score 1) 920

Yeah well not that I didn't see this coming but still, the only change I see from Obama and it's negative, not that I would have voted for McCain but still, bleh! So I agree with the others saying that only private sector can get anything done in space from here on out, the US is done as far as the Gov/NASA is concerned...

Comment Re:How would one go about it? (Score 1) 528

Sending convicts or even lay persons of a non scientific background would make no sense. Until the day when there is a thriving system able to provide food, water and oxygen for large masses of people, not to mention structures to house them; the only people who should be sent to Mars should and will be those who have beneficial scientific, medical or technical knowledge. Preferably individuals versed in multiple disciplines as with a limited number of individuals, millions of miles from "backup" you wouldn't want to be without a doctor or an engineer if someone were to be injured or killed. Don't get me wrong, sign me up the day true colonization is possible and lay people are needed there. For now that simply wouldn't be the case, what would we do other than use resources we wouldn't be helping to generate.
Mars

First Mars-Goers Should Prepare For a One-Way Trip 528

Luminary Crush writes with this excerpt from PhysOrg about the permanance of leaving Earth for Mars, at least for early travelers: "The first astronauts sent to Mars should be prepared to spend the rest of their lives there, in the same way that European pioneers headed to America knowing they would not return home, says moonwalker Buzz Aldrin. '[the distance and difficulty is why you should] send people there permanently,' Aldrin said. 'If we are not willing to do that, then I don't think we should just go once and have the expense of doing that and then stop.'" On the other hand, maybe they'll catch a ride back with Carrie-Anne Moss.
Windows

Microsoft to Issue Emergency Patch For File-Sharing Hole 348

An anonymous reader writes "Microsoft said late Wednesday that it plans to release a critical security update today to plug a security hole present in all supported versions of Windows. The company hasn't released any details about the patch yet, which is expected to be pushed out at 1 p.m. PT. Normally, Redmond issues security updates on Patch Tuesday, the second Tuesday of each month. The Washington Post's Security Fix blog notes that each of the three times in the past that Microsoft has departed from its patch cycle, it was to fix some really nasty vulnerability that criminals already were exploiting to break into Windows PCs." Reader filenavigator points out an article which describes the hole as an SMB vulnerability, and says it "allows anyone to access a Windows machine remotely without any user name or password. Any machine that exposes Windows file sharing is vulnerable." Update: 10/23 17:42 GMT by T : Reader AngryDad adds a link to Microsoft's more detailed memo.

Slashdot Top Deals

Beware the new TTY code!

Working...