"They value consistency over everything."

I am not a creationist, but consistency is the number one assumption of science. Scientist insists that nothing has ever changed in 70 million years. The air pressure is the same. Humidity is the same. Temperature never fluctuates beyond a couple of degrees (or it is Manmade CLIMITE CHANGE RUN!). Recorded history is only 6,000 years old, but apparently over the other 69,994,000 years no changes to the earth happened. If things did change then most of science is out the door. Things obviously have change because there are not any dinosaurs on earth any longer. Apparently, the atmosphere was much different at one time. The composition of the land has changed. Oh and BTW with tectonic changes in the earth do you really think the Grand Canyon has been there for 69,994,000 before recorded time? Probably not.

Even just 50 million years ago according scientist Australia was part of Antarctica. So there was still plenty of movement in tectonic plates. Even 10 million years ago the Mediterranean was still forming. 30 million years ago the West Coast of the U.S. was still forming and the area of the Grand Canyon did not exist yet. But the Grand Canyon formed before the rest of the Western United States somehow. Interesting when you put all the pieces together in science. It makes you realize that science is just one big fictional story that we tell ourselves.

I live by the Grand Canyon. These scientists are idiots. Most of us that live here know that the Grand Canyon was formed in a very short period of time. It did not take millions of years to form. Scientist get one thing stuck in their head and then can't think of anything else. Answer me one question... if you can answer it then it will prove to me that the Grand Canyon developed over millions of years. Where is all the dirt?

With any river system where erosion occurs there is a delta. With the Grand Canyon system there is no delta... i.e... no erosion over millions of years. The erosion happened very quickly... most likely from 3 lakes similar to the Great Salt Lake that drained because a land dam broke in the top lake. The lakes drained into each other and over ran the lower lake's land dam. There is satellite imagery evidence of these 3 lakes that support his view.

Also there is other evidence to support this view. When Mount Saint Helens blew it created a similar canyon. There is also another “Grand Canyon” in Hawaii called Waimea Canyon. The Waimea Canyon was created very quickly as well. It was created when the land collapsed. In both of these cases there are no delta regions from long erosion periods.

Oh and for you closed minded people, no I am not a creationist.