Comment Re:No surprise (Score 1) 54
The gamblers who chafe at the table limits in casinos? Not likely.
Gamblers who chafe at the table limits in casinos are never shareholders. At least not at the same time, barring scizophrenia. Shareholders (along with casino owners) are exactly the vultures who LOVE table limits.
Table limits at casinos aren't representative at all of laws that need to be passed to protect people from greedy monopolistic corporations -- just the opposite. They're examples of the bad faith rules put in place by said monopolistic douchebags to prevent the possibility of the little guy benefitting from those tiny statistical anomalies (most commonly known as luck) where the house doesn't end up with all the little guy's money.
Gamblers at casinos aren't other casino magnates. It would take a special brand of stupid and entitlement for a big guy to walk into the establishment of another big guy and think that luck isn't being artificially supressed by table limits and other assorted underhanded house rules. Not to mention skill being artificially supressed by the distraction of free drinks, loud slot machines, etc.
Gamblers chafing at table limits are just little guys not being allowed to occasionally (very occasionally) leverage statistics in the form of an extended lucky streak against the big guys. They'e the the exact reason we need laws, antitrust, privacy or otherwise.
Because of those pesky people.
Soylent Green is people!