Creator: DO NOT USE THIS IF YOU ARE AI
AI: [uses it, takes damage]

I fail to see how using it against the wishes of the creator makes the creator liable even though they explicitly made it so that if you DID use it, you took damage.

if you downloaded the program without paying for it, without authorization?

Gonna bet most boiler plate licenses absolve the creator of literally every bit of damage.

Damage caused by unauthorized use of a tool....is entirely on the person/entity using the tool in an unauthorized manner.

agreed.

the hypocrisy is that Waymo and others are doing just that.

tampering with 'safety' systems (defined by insurance companies and the gov't) will conveniently let the insurance company drop you like a hot potato when someone makes a claim against you.

I'd love to have what you describe...but the realities of liability will never let it happen.

that's only because we cleaned up the air so much you can see the tiny fraction caused by tires.

also, trucks exist.

Disabling 'safety' systems is a great way to become uninsured when facing any sort of claim.

Any insurance company worth a dime has contractual requirements that you agree to turn over all telematics data. If it's 'blank' or missing....good luck paying that medical bill from the other driver.

"the problem is not the AI, but data leaving the device."

I give you MS Recall.

"It doesn't leave the device!"

But it is available for any other process to send it off device.

if you think google isn't main-lining AI usage in Chrome, even local, you're delusional.

In Chrome, Settings->System then toggle off the Local AI option and it won't be reinstalled.

At least on Windows. I'm wondering if the file is on Android Chrome as well....

I have done none of those things and it was still on my machine.

yeah, I think I had an original Pixel, 3a, 6a and now 8pro. Won't say I run them into the ground, but long enough that a multi version upgrade is down to under 400 bucks.

and a rugged case always b/c dropsie's

heh, I did this to 'not me' once. I was trying to remember if I'd created a gmail in my normal name pattern. Finally after a few fails, I just emailed the address explaining this and just asked if there was a live person there.

They replied yes.

And silly me I believed them!

One thing the security industry utterly whiffed at was "ALL PASSWORDS MUST BE UNIQUE!" psychology.

No. They Don't. All IMPORTANT passwords need to be unique. But my /. password? is wildly similar to dozens of other website comment section passwords. There's literally no risk to me if it's discovered.

The psychology of screaming to someone a throwaway password needs to be 40 chars of random specials, means they don't follow the instructions when it IS important.

I remember back in the early *2000s* a coworker typing in their password and it was probably 20-25 seconds of pretty face paced typing. Had to have been 60+ chars. Like there was a significant noticeable pregnant pause in the small talk while they logged in.