The fact that we aren't talking about time or energy requirements that are on the order of lifetimes of stars or the mass energy of a star should tell you that it broken.
This is probably the best layman explanation of cryptographic security I have ever seen. If the numbers involved in breaking something crypto related can be expressed in easily understandable terms without doing something like this: https://what-if.xkcd.com/96/
Then the crypto thing you are talking about is broken and shouldn't be used.
Maybe if you're going to do things that belong on a server you should run a server operating system rather than desktop? Like Windows Server or, better yet, Linux?
Win2k and Windows XP were Microsoft's answer to that, giving people a server operating system based on NT instead of a relative toy like Win98/ME. MS Windows 10 has gone back to the approach of a toy that just happens to be built on what used to be a server operating system.
No. Microsoft's answer to that was Server 2000 and Server 2003. Win2k and XP were built on NT4 Workstation, an OS intended for client machines, not NT4 Server, which became the aforementioned Server OS's. Windows client OS's were never intended to be used for server like tasks. Use the correct tool for the job and install a server OS if you are doing server things, be it Windows or *nix.
Not even need some specific open-sourced firmware. Just any home router / NAT / firewall can do that. Don't need smart devices, just smart people to configure it properly...
Hi. Welcome to the internet. You must be new here.
Bullshit. There is no such restriction on freedom of speech.
Here is my question, have you ever seen a study (double blind) on the safety of the full schedule of vaccines. Here is the CDC version
22 Vaccines from Birth to 15 months alone. You are so 100% sure that 22 schedule is safe and effective? Without Proof or even evidence? That is sciency, not science.
Bullshit. Sure there is. Try yelling "FIRE!" in a crowed movie theater and see how long it takes you to end up in trouble for inciting panic and causing a clear and present danger to those around you. People in trusted positions of authority on medical matters are doing the same thing when they discourage people from getting their vaccines.
Also if you had even the slightest understanding of science and ethics you would know both why such rigorous testing cannot be done and why it isn't necessary. We have mountains of historical data showing that vaccines work.
Your uneducated ravings on this topic are pseudo sciency BS at its worst.
William H Taft - Intensely disliked even by his own party to the point that over half of them backed a third party candidate instead (Teddy Roosevelt).
And you seriously can't see this happening with Trump? Really?
I just need enough to tide me over until I need more. -- Bill Hoest