Comment Here's my take on it (Score -1, Troll) 364
Linux needs to play to it's strength's, namely the fact that it uses mature development platforms for software, which leads to faster more secure applications.
Empirical evidence has shown, time and time again, that low level languages like C and Forth produce more efficient, faster, and easier to maintain code than today's so called high level languages. Why is this important? Because they (the IT world, who simply wants to sell you a new compiler every year for $2,000) try to push stuff like encapsulation and polymorphism down your throat as the saving grace and you simply accept it as fact because you don't know any better. If you're not bit shifting hot registers at runtime then you're not programming. Plain and simple. You're just plugging different blocks together and hoping like hell it will work. How would you feel if they designed bridges like that? I wouldn't feel too secure driving across a bridge that was designed like today's non open source software programs are.
Unless you see a speed increase of Olog(n) then you are simply wasting resources by using a high level language. The reason for this is simple, the amount of time spent in coding is finite, yet, oddly enough, CPU time isn't. Thusly unless you can improve an algorithm along that order then your time was wasted. This is simple first year college stuff here, hardly rocket science.
As Frankie L Brooks mentions in the seminal book The Mythical Man Month, cultural differences should be shunned, as they do not improve productivity, they only give one the impression that they do.
College prof's pimp the new stuff because that's how they keep their jobs. I've been a member of the IACP panel for the past 8 years and you should see how professor's eyes will glaze over when you start to question them in a scientific manner. They don't get that kind of stuff from their snot nosed freshman students, you can be sure. Demand some evidence from your profs when they throw this stuff at you, tell them you want to see some 3d pie charts and graphs to backup their claims.
Indeed, Linux/Open Source scores a vicoty by an order of magnitude over other platforms in this regard.
Empirical evidence has shown, time and time again, that low level languages like C and Forth produce more efficient, faster, and easier to maintain code than today's so called high level languages. Why is this important? Because they (the IT world, who simply wants to sell you a new compiler every year for $2,000) try to push stuff like encapsulation and polymorphism down your throat as the saving grace and you simply accept it as fact because you don't know any better. If you're not bit shifting hot registers at runtime then you're not programming. Plain and simple. You're just plugging different blocks together and hoping like hell it will work. How would you feel if they designed bridges like that? I wouldn't feel too secure driving across a bridge that was designed like today's non open source software programs are.
Unless you see a speed increase of Olog(n) then you are simply wasting resources by using a high level language. The reason for this is simple, the amount of time spent in coding is finite, yet, oddly enough, CPU time isn't. Thusly unless you can improve an algorithm along that order then your time was wasted. This is simple first year college stuff here, hardly rocket science.
As Frankie L Brooks mentions in the seminal book The Mythical Man Month, cultural differences should be shunned, as they do not improve productivity, they only give one the impression that they do.
College prof's pimp the new stuff because that's how they keep their jobs. I've been a member of the IACP panel for the past 8 years and you should see how professor's eyes will glaze over when you start to question them in a scientific manner. They don't get that kind of stuff from their snot nosed freshman students, you can be sure. Demand some evidence from your profs when they throw this stuff at you, tell them you want to see some 3d pie charts and graphs to backup their claims.
Indeed, Linux/Open Source scores a vicoty by an order of magnitude over other platforms in this regard.
