All these models have significant physical requirements and the likelihood they all have a physical resource that could be impacted by the same event is definitely non-zero.

The issue should be tracked down to determine if they all had some similar resource contention issue.

Purchasing an American car is absolutely the stupidest thing anyone can do today when buying a vehicle.

So you used a version that didn't suffer from the issues while a substantial amount of their user base were affected and therefor all is right in the world?

Useless. You. And Sonos.

Customer centric? What's more customer centric than disabling speakers people bought in the past?

Never Sonos.

You realize they'll get your birthdate within a day or two as you transition into a new group. Maybe on a service or two it takes a couple of weeks to update, but it's still close enough.

Once a feature becomes available to you at an age change you're going to want to transition to that group as soon as possible.

Let's use LPR for their purpose; reading and validating license plates. Strip the devices down to the minimum required and load lists of license plates to them. They can trigger in those and generate events. They can also be audited to make sure the plates listed are official stolen/bolo, etc, as required.

That's it. That's all they do. Leave the spy craft to spies.

The music business is pushing this; they don't want the competition. While some artists might not want AI competing with them; the real question is who do these charts represent. The music industry, or listeners.

I'll give you a hint; the charts will be gone in 5yrs.

I absolutely despise the Canadian content rules, particularly the implementation of them.

However, that's a Canadian issue and problem, the intent of implementing it isn't to impede foreign investment or business in Canada.

So, foreigners can fuck off about criticizing it; that's Canadas job.

Thank you for your feedback *aniels. We'll get back to you at 2?2-555-1212 in the next couple of days.

When someone with evidence refuses to produce evidence for evaluation you can rightly assume the evidence tells a story they don't want told.

I think we already have a definite minimum that handles the situation.

The article indicates all the books have an ISBN.

Here's a hint for the general masses. ISBN isn't printed in your one-off rare manuscript. It's printed in mass produced books from the twentieth century or later.

Hey didn't get quite the buyin they wanted on the original story so they manufactured this one by shipping a book to Amazon.

It isn't, but I find this article extract and its tone unprofessional, so honestly I couldn't care less anymore.

If you're hitting something the size of a building you don't need an Nvidia chip.

My issue with it isn't that they're using a processor, it's that this class of processor is likely overkill. So, either it's so readily available they have a warehouse full of them, or somebody wants to stir up shit. I'm guessing it's effectively the latter. It's more politically with it to raise the concern that it is to bother sourcing this component for production.

Basic image recognition sufficient for mapping navigation can be done in significantly lesser hardware.

Why?!

Seems most likely to be a misinformation campaign. There's plenty of ways to navigate a middle and none of them require AI.