> Also it shows rather profound ignorance of the Earth's climate and weather systems to think that a rare event must somehow be an indication of something wrong.
Outliers are early indicators in any process of discovery.
> Please note, none of this is aimed at trying to disprove or prove man made climate change. It is simply pointing out that this is a stupid argument and doesn't help your position at all.
Stating the obvious is hardly an argument. Saying the there is more energy in the system is only self-evident. More CO2 -> more heat = more energy. How is that spin? You wrongfully represent the AC as "arguing a position" -- anyone who thinks climate change is not man made is nuts. If there is more precipitation (energy), more winds (energy), than yeah, some places might be colder or wetter than before. This is not self-serving rationalization, it is stating obvious physics.
Just look at the melted polar ice cap.
But of course you're right. There's nothing wrong. Fossil fuels are our friend. Exxon is looking out for you!
wrong. He quits in disgrace. The parent's characterization of Japanese corporate culture is accurate.
There is also a much smaller wage disparity. A CEO in Japan making more than 10 times the average worker would be considered shameful. Yes -- there are CEO's capable of feeling shame left in the world.
> Which president most recently granted MFN status to China and signed NAFTA?
Clinton. Right? Why is that important?
Are you saying another president would have protected American manufacturing jobs better?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biodeisel#Yield
The yields tropical regions can get from palm are pretty amazing to but what is ideal is using useless land (NV) for algae farms.
Machines have less problems. I'd like to be a machine. -- Andy Warhol