Because that's the temperature we usually have here in South-east Spain, 90 to 120 F. All. Damn. Summer.

No idea and I don't care!

I don't really care about my caloric intake and in fact I find it pretty dumb to pay attention to that (unless you have nutrition problems, of course).

Am I AT work right now? You can bet I am. Am I working right now? Well...Let's say my lunch hour is kinda elastic ;)

Dammit... I live on the 11th :(

Now add to that percentage, the votes of all the non-US people that bothered to "translate" the poll to Celsius, so they could choose one of the serious options instead of the easy one (like me)... and that 42% will probably be a lot closer to 50%.

Private copying of cultural works (music, books, movies etc) *even if you don't own the original work* is a right granted by the Spanish Constitution itself.
The right to make backup copies of software is there as well, but only if you own the original. Public communication of a copyrighted work without the consent of the copyright holder is not permitted, BUT "sharing" between family and/or friends is legal as it is not considered "public" communication.
However, any of the aforementioned actions are prohibited if done for lucrative purposes.

The current points of conflict are a) whether sharing X in a P2P network can be considered "public communication", and b) whether downloading a song or movie can be considered "lucrative" as you're "saving" the money it would've cost you to buy the original.

For some common cases, current jurisprudence states that: downloading songs etc. for personal use is NOT lucrative and thus legal; downloading "backup copies" of software IS illegal (unless you can prove you own the original); offering P2P links (torrents or ED2K links) in a website is legal unless you put advertisements in it or, by any other means, get a monetary profit from that website traffic; selling pirated copies of anything is illegal (the key here being the word "sell").

Probably this website can help you: http://a2knetwork.org/reports2009/spain . It may, of course, contradict what I just said, but since IANAL I'd rather trust the website :)

No, that would be if everyone were made of ferrets.

I think the current results represent pretty well two of the manin groups of Slashdot's readers: 44% of USA citizens that believe that your country should be the "guardian of the world" and protect "everyone's" rights; and 28% of non-USA readers that believe that, as good and nice as protecting everyone's rights is, you should be doing it only in USA territory (although I concede that your country should do their best ***diplomatic*** efforts to protect US citizens everywhere in the world).