Comment Re:So they can't talk about proprietary products?? (Score 1) 587
But as the corporate world began to look for ways to market Linux-based distros, it was Gnome's relative purity (not any of its technical merits, which are few) that got KDE pushed to the sidelines.
It was not "purity", it was greed: You used to have to buy Qt licenses to develop closed source software for KDE. No investment like that was necessary for Gtk apps. This has of course changed now that Nokia has put Qt under LGPL.
A $99 Graphics Card Might Be All You Need 618
Comment The two guys' bottom line is nearly correct (Score 5, Interesting) 559
Still a nice little laugh, that video.
Comment Re:The Google service I'm still waiting for ... (Score 1) 342
Because google still hasn't indexed my website at home, several months after I filled out the form to request that they do so.
That form has been rumored to be rather useless anyway in the past (sorry, no references at hand just now). Get your website linked to by sites with high page rank and Googlebot will be there in no time.
If my website was hosted by google, and resided on google hardware and storage, they would presumably index my page a little quicker.
Why? Googlebot isn't visiting sites sooner that are less hops away, or does it?
Comment What is all this about? (Score 5, Insightful) 869
Linus says KDE 4.0 was a "half baked release". Yes it was. He complains he got the update pushed through Fedora and that it "was not as functional". I'm sure it wasn't. He also might want to reconsider his choice of Linux distribution if he isn't happy with their update policy.
We've been through this a million times here and on most any other tech site on the whole of the web: KDE 4.0 wasn't ready for general use, KDE themselves said so, it might have been a mistake to release it anyway, or not, the communication could have been a lot clearer, yada yada yada.
Linus thinks so, too. Fine. Also, yawn.
Comment Re:Two questions: (Score 2, Insightful) 108
1. Are any of the people involved with the original in on this? I know TFA says that they were in contact with Activision regarding backstory, but that's not necessarily the same thing.
I think that's rather unlikely. Mr. Collins explicitly says in the interview that he's "continually searching for people who were involved in the games over the years" and quotes only Activision as a source for the "entire mythology". None of the original Zork Implementors works (or has worked in the past) for Activision.
Also, the artwork on http://www.legendsofzork.com/ makes you wonder if Mr. Collins has really caught up with the "entire mythology". This adventurer is from anywhere but from Zork -- not with that torch in his hand.
Text-Messaging Behind the Wheel 517
Google Turns Over Data on Suspected Pedophiles In Brazil 445
NVIDIA Doubts Ray Tracing Is the Future of Games 198
Adobe Flash Exploit Could Log Keystrokes 156
Forget Math to Become a Great Computer Scientist? 942
Comment Re:Interesting Fact to observe (Score 1) 203
As many others have already noted, the USA is obviously missing from the list...With the exception of Burma (which has long been a pariah military dictatorship), all the countries
are either ruled by a communist party (or direct sucessor) or they are from an islamic culture.
Also, what's "pariah military"? Isn't that just a little bit tautological?