Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Rejoice! (Score 1) 206

This will be the next great source of consultant gigs!

Whenever this trope pops up, I recall the late 90's, when quite a few of my projects started when some people approaching my boss with a hugely complicated Excel spreadsheet that they had completely lost control over, and now they wanted it to do more, usually in the way of an improved user interface, some import/export automation and an underlying database model. My boss would talk back and forth with the customer a bit, and then drop it on my desk with a dry remark in the vein of "the usual drill". The actual work invariably involved a lot of conceptual clean-up.

At some point we might get there, but in my humble opinion it's like flying cars: technically possible, but they never really get off the ground for a fair number of very good reasons.

Comment Nuclear Fusion? (Score 2) 136

This discussion has popped up every other year for the last 60+ years, starting with Algol, Fortran and Cobol, stopping over at SQL, Visual Basic, Excel and all the point-click-profit tools, past and present. In their time, they were all meant to "democratize" programming, but LISP and Assembler (and all their spiritual descendants) are still with us.

It's like nuclear fusion: always ten years into the future.

My take: by all means give people some hammers and some wrenches, I'll happily write them an invoice after fixing their broken pipes ... but I'd much rather build them a proper house that didn't need fixing all the time.

That being said, all these developments have (arguably) made programming easier (for programmers) and will continue to do so. And, hey, if AI can reduce the boilerplate toil, count me in.

Slashdot Top Deals

I find you lack of faith in the forth dithturbing. - Darse ("Darth") Vader

Working...