Some rulings are made by partial ("panel") courts, for expedience, and when that happens the option exists to request the same court reconsider the ruling, but with a full bench ("en banc" court). That's what's going on here. This pattern of panel/en banc rulings exists at both appeals courts and SCOTUS.
Stop making stuff up. There's no such thing as a panel for SCOTUS. Every case is heard en banc.
Counter Pro-tip: No it fucking doesn't.
The internet in the US is not consolidated from an interconnection or control perspective the way that it is in small 3rd world countries with a single national ISP.
In Iran, they called up one guy at one place and said "turn this off or we'll shoot you and your family", in a system designed intentionally from day 1 to have a kill switch. Here that would require thousands of people to take separate actions, most of which have never been done before. If you call up Comcast, ATT, etc. and say "shut off outside internet access to all of your subscriber and transit customers" they will tell you we do not know how to do that.
John Wayne was a nazi
Slashdot predates 230.
It most certainly does not. Slashdot arrived in 1997. The law in question is Section 230 of the Telecommunications act of 1996
ELNK is still around but they discontinued dial-up in 2024
And yet if you look at your own comment, you'll see but one space. Double whitespace is ignored in HTML by default, so anything going back thru that layer is gonna get spit out with a single space unless the web app in question explicitly puts NBSP codes in
>Remember that FDIC make protect the banks clients, but that money comes from our taxes.
The FDIC receives no taxpayer money. They self-fund, through premiums paid by the member banks that are invested.
Get A to C adapters that fit inside the port and only carry the C to C
They're only advisory. "Standard" German sports cars are still being made with a 155 mph limiter which is a Gentleman's agreement between BMW, M-B, and VWAG going back decades. They'll do that speed through the whole country even though that would only be legal on the Autobahn, even the 2022 and newer models.
This precedent extends back to the 90s
I'm a dude
He's a dude
She's a dude
We're all dudes, hey!
- Good Burger
If you think one person dying confirmed from Omicron in the US is a 100% kill rate, you should probably leave the math and statistics to the adults
In previous years, strikes that affected the infrastructure could be overridden by the president. Specifically, Reagan ordered air traffic controllers back to work, and then fired 12K of them when they didn't. Other examples come to mind.
This is nonsense. Air traffic controllers were federal employees at that time. The president has no power to break any strikes in the private workplace, not that there's even one here in the first place.
So with that in mind, couldn't the president simply put more longshoremen to work by executive order, citing national security and other reasonable reasons?
Executive orders direct a federal agency to take some action. What federal agency is it that you think he should issue orders to?
You're just making things up because you have no idea how any of this works.
I still don't see how this situation doesn't have a quick fix.
That's because you don't understand it at all.
The Southern District of New York for example. What is more, a new president will not have pardon power over the now private citizen in matters of State criminal proceedings.
SDNY is a federal, not state court. You mean the Manhattan District Attorney, or the State AG
You can't get 100 up today on most DOCSIS systems in the US. 100 down, sure, but 100 up? This will drive a lot of fiber even in areas we wouldn't otherwise consider underserved.
So what? Name one of them that the government put into production successfully.
Do you think it's a private company that operates the GPS satellites?
It is now pitch dark. If you proceed, you will likely fall into a pit.
