That only proves that we have a lot of learning to do.

Average gamer? I think what is important is the total number of gamers and then at what ages those gamers tend to be higher in number.

"This could lead to an escalation in tensions, especially given that the US military believes that cyberattacks from foreign countries constitute acts of war."

*cough CHINA cough*

Didn't vote because mine was 60.7%, though I suppose I could have rounded.

I think having unique houses gives neighborhoods character. Also, I wonder what they will do about security, seeing as if they make it the same in all of the houses, you only need to break the system once before getting full access to everyone. (assuming it's done centrally like everything else mentioned in the article.)

My current printer is not my personal printer.

Is this discrimination against Gamefly or favoritism of Netflix?

More vague than normal? I actually had to think about it before answering the most probable question.

I second that, in the case of actually hearing people online, I think it is highly overrated. I disable all that built-in voice crap myself. (like in SC2)

As for computers, until they can make computers able to promptly and accurately execute complex commands, the idea of voice communication with computers seems to be counterproductive.

Lack of proper parenting strikes again.

Highly vague and seemingly riddled with underhanded intentions but maybe their games didn't run on Linux.

Or just use a non-moving flag for like 1/10000000th of the cost.

A million ton object that doesn't fly into buildings not located near tracks.

Yes, we owe them. However, if we ever want to pay them back, building a decent train system might help.

Robots, unlike humans, do not all share the same basic build. While a human could conceivably learn from another human's experience, robots would likely need something a lot more complex to achieve the same functions between two peers.