They work for China. Let China fund them.
I'm not sure if your a shill or perhaps just not thinking clearly, and I don't really care.
Whether the WHO did a perfect job or a shitty job, is certainly something worth investigating at some point. They are, however, doing their job which is far better than them not doing their job.
Shutting off funding to the WHO in the middle of a fucking pandemic is Donald Trump level stupidity. I suppose we can just add thousands more deaths to the butchers bill. He is a sociopath. That is all there is to it. In his attempt to find a target to blame, he endangers more lives, again. People will likely die because of this, unless others step up to fill the balance, and the sad part, the truly pathetic and sad part is congress isn't going to validate this, so the funding will go right back to where it was. This is nothing more than a transparent attempt to move blame from him. That doesn't mean the WHO did everything right. An investigation is appropriate, but this isn't that. This is just another sack of shit thrown at the wall to see what sticks after his attempt to declare himself king was soundly rebuffed.
WHO gets their funding in an annual lump sum. 2020 funding has already been distributed, so the part about defunding during the pandemic holds no water, unless it goes into next year.
A common answer I've been reading in here is to never answer or block ALL calls with their number blocked (because they are cowards). My wife is a physician, and has our home number blocked - because she is a coward. When returning pages/calls from patients there are a lot of those patients that would love to have our home number, so they could call day-and-night without having to go through the switchboard to get the actual physician on call. You won't get her to return a call until you turn your blocking off.
What if only residential people could get call number blocking, or if business had it taken away after a certain threshhold for complaints. Great idea (pat self on back), but the telcos would never give up the income from number blocking. Congress is too busy taking campaign contributions from corporations to ever give consituants any consideration in a matter such as this.
I knew a gal in an apartment I lived in (in Phoenix) who once flashed er boobs to a couple of adult males (I missed 'em). The manager called the police and they charged her with a sex crime. I spoke with her about a year later, she was homeless and living on the street or with any guy that would let her stay. After the flashing and sex crime she was thrown out of the apartment. No other apartment in Phoenix would rent to her because of the crime free lease addendums.
How many other stories are there about people getting charged with a sex crime for taking a leak outside?
If this gets enforced strickly, how many people will have to log-off? Is Slashdot considered a social network site?
We only have our experiences to draw upon what we know.
Godforbid someone wants to switch to IP telephony, because we all know that that tech is never going to catch on, and it's a much much better idea to keep paying for old fashioned phone trunks every month than just one nice internet connection.IP telephony can be great. My experience at ATMI was the CIO wanted it because it was cool. The phone guy would have to prepare the project documents every six months for him to weigh out the cost against the perceived benefit. A giant costs to upgrade a functional digital system, because the Cisco system sounds cool.
There were no usable benefits needed for the corporation. That doesnâ(TM)t mean when they move in a couple years to a new building they shouldnâ(TM)t consider it. But a forklift upgrade from the well running digital system today only gets you some flashy new screens for a couple hundred grand.
A budget is just a method of worrying before you spend money, as well as afterward.