Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
DEAL: For $25 - Add A Second Phone Number To Your Smartphone for life! Use promo code SLASHDOT25. Also, Slashdot's Facebook page has a chat bot now. Message it for stories and more. Check out the new SourceForge HTML5 internet speed test! ×

Comment Re:Morons are running the USA (Score 1) 647

I make every effort to tell the truth when I speak. My post uses clear, simple math, hard facts taken from the US Constitution, and a supposition based on the two, not a forecast as would have had to be the case with the story you refer to.

Under a proportional system *with no funny business* (that includes gerrymandered congressional districts), if candidate A gets 45 percent of the popular vote, and candidate B gets 50 percent, then by definition, they should get approximately 45% and 50% of the Electoral College votes as well, not accounting for rounding errors.

Furthermore, I watched fivethirtyeight.com's forecasts throughout the election, and as I recall, they didn't exactly have the best accuracy this cycle. I don't trust that site's forecasts any more than I trust mainstream media to do the same.

So, where's the lie?

Comment Re:Morons are running the USA (Score 0) 647

...and the number you're looking for is 711,000 - the average ratio of state population to US House representatives.

By definition, the popular vote, while not being legally binding, is a reflection of states' populations, which are in turn supposed to be what determines the relative number of Representative in the House. The number of Electors each state gets is supposed to be equal to the count of their House reps, plus 2 (representing the Senate).

The problem, as has been the case since time immemorial, is that most states in the country are winner-take-all (all but one or two in the 2016 election). If all states had been strictly proportional with no funny business, then the results would have been approximately 259 votes for Clinton, 248 for Trump, and 31 for other candidates (not accounting for rounding errors).

Comment Re:Which of course has nothing to do with... (Score 2) 409

On top of that, we should awaken the portions of our genes that permit regeneration. Currently we have only a few parts of our bodies that regenerate. The intestines for example still regenerate. But there is no reason it couldn't grow new internal organs, grow new limbs, grow new eyes, new ears, regenerate nerves, etc.All of that is latent in our biology.

But...didn't researchers at Marvel already establish that this may sometimes lead to people dying in sudden, very hot explosions? :-P

Comment Re:Exactly. (Score 1) 318

You're right of course about the sentiment regarding ads versus paying for the service. And yes, cable companies are scum. Can't say I agree with TV being more addictive than heroin, however:

It's not fucking entitlement, it's recognizing what you're paying for

It is *precisely* an entitlement, by definition:

http://www.merriam-webster.com...

"the condition of having a right to have, do, or get something"

You are using the "so-and-so has a sense of entitlement" definition of the word, and with the same negative connotation as some use when describing various social programs. Like those social programs, you paid for the service and therefore are entitled to it.

Comment Re:Good GUI mods? (Score 4, Informative) 108

Since you asked, here are some mods/modpacks for you to try out:

More Blocks
Homedecor
Pipeworks
Gloopblocks
Streets
Infrastructure (cheapie's version)
Carbone MOBs (separated out from the Carbone subgame)

A few that do change the gameplay somewhat radically:

Plantlife modpack
More Trees
Technic modpack

There are a ton more on the forums. All of the above can be used together (as is usually the case with this engine).

Disclaimer: I maintain and or contribute to several of these.

Comment Ministry of Truth, anyone? (Score 2) 73

From the article:

By erasing all evidence of both the pre-Islamic past and alternative interpretations of Islam, ISIS hopes to create a world where knowledge of any belief system except their own interpretation of Islam is forgotten forever.

These people (that is, the extremists) honestly believe they can make this Orwellian fantasy come true in the digital age? Sure, the world will lose a lot of precious artifacts, but information can't be destroyed - and that's withOUT people like Allahyari acting to resurrect those artifacts. The world needs more people like him.

*shakes head*

Comment Re:I've been planning this for years. (Score 1) 597

> The one thing I need to work out - exactly how do we make a Lava Lamp work efficiently on DC power....

You only need a 10-25W bulb for those, so just build a specialized "bulb" that consists of a couple of white LEDs for the light source, and a very small heating element to get the wax moving.

Comment Re:Grapples? Thats the nice way when a D is Prez? (Score 2) 134

And you war-obsessed, money-blinded, overly-religious conservatives are saying what, exactly, about the current president? That he's some kind of angel of sunlight? No. You guys are currently calling him the worst president ever, claiming he's gonna make himself dictator (despite the 22nd Amendment to the US Constitution), comparing his administration to ... well let's not Godwin this. Notice I did NOT single out any current or past US political party.

Here's a newsflash: since before this country was founded, the person currently holding the highest office in most any country has been called every nasty name or epithet in [the then current version of] the book by his or her opposition, while that person's supporters of course use "softer" words when criticizing him or her, with variances of course depending on the country.

And yeah, I meant every word of that opening sentence. Why? Because I am a moderate, and would like to think I can see *both* sides of the current political climate, and conservatives today are just as bad as they were 50, 100, 200 years ago. The noises you make are the same, only the reasons and target of that noise have changed.

How's the phrase go? "Reality leans liberal" or something like that? Maybe it does, but only if you compare it to "conservative" as the terms are measured in the US. Compare it to the rest of the civilized world, and reality is (and should be) a lot closer to center/moderate.

Steering this back on topic, that means we keep our privacy, security, strong encryption without ANYONE else holding the keys but us), and so on, and the government goes and dunks its collective heads in the toilet. They don't need our data to make us any safer, and we don't need to BE any "safer" anyway.

Slashdot Top Deals

The absence of labels [in ECL] is probably a good thing. -- T. Cheatham

Working...