Not sure you're aware that parent only listed SOME of the potential costs. There are numerous more, appliances, plumbing issues... ugh, they are always expensive. I ended relining all the sewage pipes under my home all the way to curb. I've probably spend almost 30k in plumbing, 20k for the roof, 20k in AC units as my house has two.

Oh yeah, then because of said plumbing, you have termites and related damage, roof rats that tunnel under the house and come up under the bath tub.

As a home owner, it can be quite expensive over the long haul, there are a lot of good arguments with renting and investing all that money you would have spent on not just upkeep, but also improvements.

Of course I have a ton of equity now and it does more than cover what I've spent keeping the roof over my head. Home ownership is not for the faint of heart.

Interesting hot take on 7 lines of words making a wall. I did not state Morning Joe or MSNBC lied, I said they omit information when it doesn't fit their narrative Polls results ahead of 2016, downplaying Joe Biden's age as a problem, and hyping Kamala Harris' chances, especially as they got closer to the election are all examples of this.

If you're an MSNBC watcher I suggest you switch to TYT, you'll be better informed and none of these things will surprise you in the future.

I conflated nothing in my word wall, I'm not sure you understand was conflate means. I literally described how they are different from their right wing counterparts.

NPR is regional, some regions are more biased than others, you will however be hard pressed to find situations where NPR is factually incorrect. That is the difference. Fox, OAN Newsmax, MSNBC, they all get facts wrong in their rush for a 24 hour news cycle. The terrible three for the right also spread misinformation to fit the narrative of their owners. MSNBC will omit information if it doesn't fit their narrative, they don't outright mislead nearly as often.

NPR however, stays out of this all-together and follows actual journalistic principles even if the stories they choose to cover are often considered liberal, although I'm not sure what that means since its just a thing that happened and they provide details about it.

That said, lead in Huel Black Edition especially is still less than a typical meal and consumer reports is fear mongering to gain exposure because that's exactly what they do. It may mean that Huel sources their Pea protein differently and that results in less cadmium which is missing from this conversation along with lead.

The other side of this coin is just showing how f'ed we are that so many rely on quick meal replacements because everybody is working far too hard and far too much and often don't have ready access to anything healthy. My data center days I bring a Huel shake and throw it in the fridge because otherwise I may not eat anything for 12 hours unless I skip out to get some fast good which is definitely worse than Huel.

Sorry, you sound old. I suffer from workhorse syndrome as do a great many of my peers. The harder you work, the more efficient you work, the more work is piled on. Work ethic no longer plays a part, the company gives me the work of 5 to 10 other people because that is definitely cheaper and more efficient for the stock price. In reality its abuse of your best resources and creates unsustainable output.

Much like the resistance to making things energy efficient to reduce the impact of climate change, current behavior is not sustainable. The end of the road isn't quite clear but you can't always be running a marathon.

You can simply look at the wage stats. Productivity has skyrocketed over 40 years. Wage growth has stagnated, this means there is no longer a reward for many people to work hard, why would they have interest in it then?

Employers have a deep sense of entitlement without giving anything back these days. It has to be a two way street otherwise its not sustainable in either direction. My yearly review used to always be with the owner of my previous company. We both understand that my raise was him investing in me, and my continued employment was me investing my time into the company. The goal is that we are both successful. He ended up selling the company but it was a good ride while it lasted.

yes, but poster you're replying to was specifically stating that you're not going to know if Biden's policies were helping because you've stopped analysis which is exactly why this is silly.

So the reality is as follows: broadband subsidies continue giving telecoms billions of dollars every single year but now we don't care if they spent the money on yachts or actual telecom infrastructure. Biden's policies were trying to help them accountable for our tax dollars, something you would think we would be important in the age of DOGE.

I see Xen Orchestra supports S3 compatible buckets, does that mean it supports immutable storage? Backup discussions are almost always lacking when talking about platform shifting. I find Azure immutable storage, especially in the archive tier are more affordable than AWS, they don't mention that. I assume Backblaze would work as they offer S3 compatible buckets but that term has burned me on several occasions. Just because there is support for S3 compatible buckets doesn't mean your solution will work. Ran into that with both Synology and QNAP for local storage.

While I sympathize being in a similar position myself, adding a new cluster to an existing vCenter with distributed switch and doing storage vmotion is quite friendly. In Hyper-v/Azure Local land you can use the Azure migration tool however and your downtime is largely limited to the length of a reboot. Not zero downtime like vmotion can provide but not that bad. I did it for 300 VMs to get to Nutanix AHV using Nutanix Move which is very similar.

Changing platforms alltogether is always going to come with some heartburn. if you were only using basic features then its pretty easy. If you were using NSX and need to migrate to Datacenter firewall then heaven help you, they are not the same. SCVMM does a lot of the heavy lifting there but man, in a HA environment it sure requires a lot of resources compared to vCenter.

For me, the amazing part of all of this is that it used to be good enough to know one platform, these days you have to be proficient in several to be successful.

That was the whole point of essentials bundle, for about 50k you could have a 2 node cluster with an active/backup san and have enterprise uptime on a small business budget. We did these every single day.

Combine that with needing licensed versions of ESXi to take snapshot and thus do backups efficiently and you had a very easy to maintain system and it was relatively cheap.

I have plenty of customers that have RTO/RPO measured in seconds that are quite a bit smaller than you'd think. I just wish Zerto would support AHV or really any OpenStack based solution.

My presumption is that the person selling sandwiches is pretty damn likely not to be rich.

The rest of your reply is just more absurdity. No one is forcing the rich guy to buy from a specific sandwich guy, if they have a more favorable arrangement they are free to do so.

Now, we'll hop out of the analogy. Countries like Cambodia, Fiji, Vietnam, and many more all got tariffed because Trump stupidly perceives a trade deficit as a loss despite how out of touch with reality that is. None of those countries could afford to buy from us as much as we buy from them.

If you wanted to generate more favorable terms, Trump version 1 took an ironically smarter approach as those tariffs were far more targeted. It was still stupid and put a crap ton of American farmers out of business as trade wars do have knock on costs. Targeted tariffs have been successfully used many times but they only work in small doses, all large scale uses of tariff have resulted in economic catastrophe and that was before a globally integrated marketplace was fully established. The effects will be far worse this time around.

The world produces enough food to feed the entire population multiple times over and yet millions still die of famine, I say yes, it does indeed cause their deaths.

It is not the only cause of their deaths but it is a significant contributing factor. It is also just one example out of thousands. Look at vitamin hucksters trying to sell vitamin A to "cure" measles only to maim and kill others from liver failure after consuming too much vitamin A. The same crap happened during covid with Ivermectin which is a fantastic product for killing parasites, but in no way does it kill a virus.

IBM killed many employees by protecting the chips they manufactured from dust and other contaminants while not protecting the bunny suit wearer from the extremely poisonous chemicals in-use.

Erin Brockovic became famous for similar reasons and the examples go on and on and on.

Unfettered capitalism will only care about capital, it will externalize everything it can in that pursuit. Look at Boeing, once the pinnacle of engineering prowess. Late stage capitalism kicked in, management only cared about capital and profit growth, safety and quality suffered. Story as old as time, hucksters have existed for hundreds of thousands of years as you so kindly pointed out. In those times famine largely had other causes, it is entirely optional today however, capitalism keeps it going and will continue to lead to more deaths unless we can provide some safety rails.

That is the main problem today, we used to do trust busting and actually regulate industry, now we have companies too big to fail.

Feeding a troll I know, but BMWs are made with parts that are imported from China, Germany, Canada, a whole host of countries. Retooling your factory does not fix the problem because the tariffs are still killing your demand. Now you also have to pay for reciprocal tariffs that are now being stood up in response to our tariffs.BMW has already laid off people as a result, they will continue to do say until there is some change in head winds. Stellantis is doing the same and we're only in the beginning here.

Trump thinks tariffs can replace income tax and that is a whole special level of stupid to support if you're not ultra rich.

Let's also keep in mind there was no tariff on Russia with a bs excuse that trade is so low its not working setting a tariff. Meanwhile we set a tariff on Fiji which has even lower levels of trade.

I'll accept that the Russia tariff may be used as a bargaining chip with the war in Ukraine, but it makes very little sense to leave them out. Israel even removed all of their tariffs and we still slapped them with tariffs due to trade deficit which I'm convinced the administration thinks it means something entirely different than it it.

That is some of the major irony of cutting USAID, a lot of those problems were targeted to give U.S. businesses more customers abroad. Given how long they were talking about tariffs they are remarkably not well thought out in their execution. I could have accepted valid arguments for targeted tariffs, but this bs is a whole other level with the largest tax increase in history on American citizens and all to fund tax cuts for the rich.

Good lord, that is quite an absurd statement. If a rich man buys a sandwich from a poor man, the poor man isn't taking advantage of the rich man by not buying anything in return.

9 million people a year die from famine or famine related disease. This is caused by capitalism and just one way in which people die as a result of capitalism.

How many people die each year because they can't get needed healthcare? How many people die from pollution caused by deregulated capitalists? How many die on the streets because they don't have homes?

The reality is that people die either way, its just a lot slower and just as needless a death. Lots of isms lead to the same outcome, it just looks a bit different. We live in post scarcity world today, we can produce enough to feed everyone handily but we don't because of the constructs around capitalism.

I do still believe the base idea is probably the best starting point, but it also cannot exist without proper regulation. As wealth disparity continues to grow it only leads to one place; another French revolution, this time on my a much larger scale. The ultra rich would do well to understand that you can't just bleed your customers dry, eventually they have nothing left. When they have nothing left they will start to take by force. I don't wish to see things devolve like that, which I why I support strong regulation and getting money the hell out of politics.

Strong regulation still requires it to be meaningful and actually regulate the thing you're trying to regulate. Calling swimming pools a body of water is quite silly, we live in a time where some bad regulations lead to people going crazy and saying no regulation. I wish nuance wasn't so lost in all the noise these days.

Agreed, its quite astonishing to me the difference in what happens when you take a risk and fail if you're wealthy versus if you're poor. In one circumstance you are often bailed out at tax payer expense I might add, and the other you end up homeless depending on the severity of misfortune.

Hell, I personally know a fairly wealthy person that has sold the company they inherited twice now, and twice he has bought it back at pennies on the dollar after the private equity firm hollows it out.

Failure looks a lot different if you start out with a lot.