An assumption is that robots will not have sophisticated AI and will always need a human to manage it. What happens when the AI is able to manage it and has no need for human managers or a corporation?
Suppose the self driving car is able to act as a self contained corporation, earn it's own profit, pay for it's own repairs, hire or pay for it's own new designs based on data it and it's clones collected from passengers?
The problem is either going to be "who owns the robots" or "who pays the taxes". Human beings don't want to pay taxes but don't want robots to pay taxes because a very small group of humans expect to own in concentrated fashion the robots which they don't want taxes.
But there is no technical reason why robots require human owners. An autonomous agent which can take on all the functions of those humans need not even be very smart or sophisticated to have the ability to interact as a self contained business or individual economic unit.
They are investigating how Bitcoin and cryptocurrencies can be abused. Isn't that exactly what they should be investigating?
Bitcoin is not illegal, they aren't banning or criminalizing it. Terrorist finance doesn't benefit any of us.
This is what they are paid ot do. They should study stuff like this and find ways to prevent terrorism.
There are always going to be users of anything good whether it be Bitcoin or the Internet, who will try to exploit or abuse the tool.
There are cults and terrorists out there. There are sex traffickers out there. These sorts of tools may empower them so what is wrong with studying that?
I'm sure other governments are studying how to use Bitcoin for cyberwarfare or for state sponsored terrorism so of course the United States should be looking at how to defend itself.
So I agree that the US government along with many others should be studying exactly this sorta thing.
Studying it is better than banning it. They have a certain mission and their job is to deal with warfare. The rest of us don't have to be concerned with war and terrorism 24/7.
But let's not pretend like there wont someday be a gang of terrorists who try to use Bitcoin because that is bound to happen someday. The better it is studied the more likely terrorism can be stopped.
Because I can't see these kinds of shoes being the type we could wear on airplanes.
Bitcoin is already divisible so there are more Bitcoins than dollars. Mining will cause more to generate far into the future so what are you talking about?
The NSA puts too much trust in it's employees obviously.
And that will eventually replace everything else.
Well it could be BTC Guild anyway.
All it would do is result in a new proof of work for Bitcoin which is probably a good thing anyway.
The real question is whether or not it will effect Mastercoin?
Because that is what matters most.
Seems we need reminding of this classic by Ken Thompson.
Slip a backdoor into a RHEL 6.x (or any other major Linux distribution) version of GCC and make it do two major things:
1. Slip a backdoor into any Linux kernel it compiles.
2. Replicate itself in any version of GCC it compiles.
Choose some entry point which changes very rarely so the chances of incompatibility with new code is small.
This would probably keep RHEL with any kernel version tainted for generations of releases without very little chance of being spotted, because there are no changes in the distributed source code of either project
Or bugs in the random number generator.
Luck, that's when preparation and opportunity meet. -- P.E. Trudeau