"The team used a 27in..."
Who has a 27" TV in their living room? I have 1920x1080 27" and 2560x1440 27" computer monitors in front of me right now. The difference is night and day. This study is fucktarded throughout and contributing to the reason people don't trust science. Do it again with a 40" or bigger and STFU with your 27" strawman.
It is only because of the Starlink constellation that we can observe reentry plasma.
Oh really? Here's some from 1965: https://www.youtube.com/watch?...
...or an exhaust port and one whiny pilot to send it with feeling.
We're struggling to keep our vulnerable population alive and housed while the EU is fighting about what's in a sausage.
The AI that cleans up your audio isn't an LLM. The bubble is about LLMs.
A start-up is any company that is funded by investor money with aspirations to go public in order to obtain more investor money. That's what my observations indicate anyway. It's not like a checkbox on an official form or anything.
The fur industry is struggling because nobody wants to do the job of clubbing seals. Even with big pay offers, they can’t find enough people willing to swing the clubs.
That's what she said.
People don't make customer service reports for Unreal crashes because it can submit a log with one click. What does making your own engine have to do with a game using Unreal? Just own the rocky launch, drop some free cosmetics, don't fuck up the DLC again, and your audience will forgive you.
Very funny. The article says alcohol and sex and you claim it's not alcohol to trick us into thinking you're having sex.
Yah, I turned it off too. The story seems to be about 3rd party AIs submitting tickets via the GitHub API. Or, more likely, the story is about someone getting outraged for views.
This is about git commit messages, not documentation. If your point is that some people are bad a communicating, you're proven it on the comprehension side.
Your level of mistrust, on the other hand, seems to indicate something completely different.
The word you're looking for is experience. Something you've demonstrated a lack of in regards to AI and CS competency.
The students there told me that AI can at max be asked to explain one line of code, it routinely already failed at two connected ones.
The smart students are saying this because they can get through your busy work faster with AI and don't want you to know. The dumb students are saying this because they aren't smart enough to manage the AI. You are believing this because why?
Your argument is garbage. You sound like a disinformation AI. Companies aren't training one AI in the same sense one artist is trained. If an AI company wants 10,000 AI instances so it can support 10,000 simultaneous users, they aren't buying 10,000 copies of superman references to train off, which is how you would train 10,000 artists.
Your good nature will bring you unbounded happiness.
