That's why our current legal system exists, in theory. To make sure that people in general are best represented and that the laws aren't abused. This is all in theory and ideally of course. In practice that doesn't exactly happen all the time. What worries me in a sense is that if this went to court... who would be arguing what? Obviously certain elements within our own government that upholds our laws, would like to see this bid for protection under the first amendment succeed, yet our own government would be arguing against it in court? I'm not so sure. It seems like a conflict of interests at first glance.