... we shall see how much money google can make over VPN only traffic!

I'm still waiting for that AOLED display...

This would be rather more convincing to me if the listeners were not part of a group where they could possibly confer with each other (groups of people discussing a subjective subject are likely to come to the same conclusion), and/or if the results have been shown to be consistently repeatable.

Still an interesting start, though. Definitely merits further investigation.

Personally, I've never heard the term "darwinism" coming out of the science community. It's always been obvious to me that Darwin is celebrated so much because he made a major breakthrough, which then enabled all the further progress in genetics, medicine, etc. we enjoy today - not because he's considered some infallible father of an ideology. I think that those who consider "darwinism" an ideology are just projecting the weaknesses of their own belief system onto science because they don't understand what science really is and how it works.