You've just won the slashdot award for the stupidest comment of the day.

No, they don't. Computer have no positive effect on child brains, which develops using interactions with its environment. TVs and computers are a real threat to childs consciousness and intelligence. BTW, you may ask some Silicon Valley's gurus why they put their childs in technology free schools : http://www.nytimes.com/2011/10/23/technology/at-waldorf-school-in-silicon-valley-technology-can-wait.html

What about the recent WHO alarm, then ? It's strange that when some studies find a correlation between phone use and cancer, almost immediately there's another one that shows the opposite.

HFCS can be found everywhere in food, I would like to know your numbers telling that its use has been declining. And I would also like to know how you define honey and HFCS-55 chemically. There's a lot of differences in the process to produce honey from flowers and corn syrup from... corn.

And who will have to prove that the supposed 80% scientists in the consensus are the "bottom" ones ? Should those "bottom" scientists be the ones who have no prize or celebrity ?

Your logic is flawed : dinosaurs died of environmental conditions that noone was able to change. Current global climate change exists because of our selfish and blind activity, and this is something we CAN change. If I take your logic, many humans died at Tchernobyl, due to a great sensitivity to radiations. Should we say, then, that we should have done nothing to protect these people ? BTW, doing nothing for our environment seems more and more dangerous for our proper survival (bees, mammals, trees, oceans, etc...). Do you have childs and think about their future ?