They need to take criminal action against all actors. This is very clearly grounds to pierce the corporate veil. Plus also to go after the company for criminal activity, not just civil.

AND they should digup some way to compound the criminal punishment magnitude. Yeah each individual one is a paper cut, but because of what it was used for (LLM) the damage is far beyond even a civil settlement like happened already. Instead this is a heinous criminal act because the changes are socially significant.

People need to stop hiding behind corporations and acting criminally. Corporations themselves need to be subject to criminal behavior too, and then break the veil and go after the people inside them.

As it is corporations are ways to act criminally and hide behind a shield. As long as any single act isn't so bad then you are safe.

Look at Read.AI as an example. THEY ARE MALWARE. But since they also "sell" a software service its okay?

Warning: do not install or engage with read.ai. It spreads like a virus, sucking your contacts and emails when you are on a video call, then it emails them too and lures them in. Total sidebar, sorry. Just google if you are curious.

OR, now hear me out:

  4) do it yourself without AI.

That'll solve the problem. Reduce the corp protections on the executive team if the Ai they make takes autonomous illegal actions.

Once they're more personally culpable, the companies will quickly stop being so reckless.

> If you aren't being a cunt causing problems - then its a non issue....

Said every authoritarian regime leader everywhere (usher in the Nazis)

Two things here. Students 100% should switch because it creates a more rounded mental model, instead of a mono-culture of OS understanding.
Other people, they're paid to work. If they have to learn some before becoming productive again, well, that's the cost of doing business. Just like training a new person.

Its just not a big deal.

But in reality it can happen w/any system that has open-submit add-ons.

Sorry for the typo (their doing).

1. Computers are not responsible.

Thus AI or any other decisioning system run by a computer should not be making suggestions, giving guidance, or worse taking action in a manner on their own. In all scenarios it should have to be associated with a responsible party (human or company) and that entity is merely using the output of the computer for guidance, as with any other advice, and the decision followed by consequences thereafter is in the hands of that entity — this really doesn't need to be spelled out, but apparently it does. In this case, OpenAI /is/ the culpable party, that is somehow able to keep going despite the gross damage their product is having on all of society, because the executives have boners so hard for this myopic notion they can go down in history for making the first truly self-aware AI, that they can't see past the damage their doing

(side-note: we'll have such a thing as soon as we have flying cars. And just like people thought flying cars were "just around the corner" in the 50-s and 60-s... yeah).

That expression—the actual film—is in the public domain.
The likeness is not.
Pretty simple.

Schools need to recognize not everyone learns the same, not every one tests the same. They need to stop the insanity of expecting a "normal" way and then the accommodated way, and consider if the very way they teach and test themselves are flawed.

Opinion time, which I don't have time to explain a lot of, but I think our entire model of schooling is entirely broken.

Tests should be about demonstrating COMPETENCY not the ability to memorize something you'll subsequently forget. All tests should be open-book too. Any teacher who thinks they need to do a closed book test doesn't know how to properly make a test. The real world is open book.

Ohh, but that's harder right? So I guess we just keep the broken system we have.

And don't get me started on grades. They are toxic. You shouldn't just suddenly stop trying to learn a thing they say "well so far you're a 4 out of 5 and that kid over there is a 2 out of 5, now move along, even if you didn't understand it."

WTF? No, you keep trying until you pass. No grades. You pass, or you keep trying. no arbitrary "welp, time to move this one on I guess, even if they didn't figure it out."

And blindness doesn't exist either. Nor being deaf. These people claiming such just need to try harder, right?

Just let it be a state choice. Feds need to get out. Each state can pick whatever messed-up time they want.

if AI replaces most jobs, who will have the money to buy their products? It seems a lot of these pointy-haired MBA's have no idea other than clueless following the buzz-word talk.

From a centrist, your arguments are equally applicable to the other side.
Yeah Trump is an extreme nutjob. But the outliers exist in all equations.
Generally speaking both parties are equally corrupt. The Right AND the Left.

They're called "Politicians" and it doesn't matter what flavor they pretend to align to, they're all corrupt.

By "most farmers" do you mean the independent farmers or the megacorporations who've bought out most independent farmers?