Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:How about a "UL approved" instead? (Score 1) 71

Good idea, but these do exist in many forms though they're not necessarily keeping up with industry needs. I know for 61508 SIL (Safety Integrity Levels) many companies, which I'm not going to mention here, offer these services. Of course, the problem is how do you know that an algorithm is good enough? For SIL, they basically say if it's complex at all, then don't do it. Of course, these are safety systems, so they need to guarantee safety. But at times it feels like they're saying if you don't want to get in car wreck, then you must walk. It's not for lack kof trying on their part, it's just a hard problem.

Comment Re: What do you mean... (Score 0) 190

They're just haters. No modern computer user can honestly say they'd prefer searching through dropdown menus over the ribbon that focuses on putting the most used features at the users fingertips. The ribbon isn't perfect only because it's a difficult ui problem. But it's damn nice. I'm a big fan of libreoffice but my biggest problem with it is that it feels like office 2003 because they haven't(or legally can't? ) replicated the ribbon.

Comment Re:Coding standards? (Score 1) 27

Going even further, it's tough to get certain engineers not to write code like this. Coding standards are needed not to prevent malice but to manage incompetence. A lot of less experienced developers will gladly fight to write software without standards then these types of bugs will be everywhere. The real malice in this case is this competition which is encouraging people to write obfuscated, and thus buggy, software.

Slashdot Top Deals

"Most of us, when all is said and done, like what we like and make up reasons for it afterwards." -- Soren F. Petersen

Working...