Their theories have theories of their own. I don't buy any of this. They have no clue what's going on out there.

I think they have a problem with Elon's enemies.

There's no way to distinguish "true randomness," whatever that means, from "too many parameters to account for".

My BS meter goes up 1000x as soon as I see the word Quantum and AI in the same sentence. There's probably some remote truth to this story but my bet on the technology claims at this point is that it's BS.

A planet 1.3 x The earth's radius would have a mass of 2.2 x Earth's mass. At 2.8, the density is only 1.2x that of the earth. Given the low precision of all the numbers, I won't be surprised if it was actually just the same density as Earth.

For some reason, I read this at first as "Mice with two feathers?"

The researchers' calculations hint that these particles could have been created in just the right quantities to explain dark matter, which can only be "seen" through its gravitational pull on ordinary matter... The gravitons, if they exist, would have a mass of less than 1 megaelectronvolt (MeV

If I add calculations to it can I claim to have a theory that dark matter could be made of unicorn fart? This "study" is no different. Speculation upon speculation upon wild guesses. This is not physics.

Is Dark Matter Just Old Gravitons from Other Dimensions?

No!

If people cared about genocide, there will be public outrage about the ongoing genocide in Southern Cameroon.

https://www.genocidewatch.com/...

But I bet most of you have not even heard about this.

It still is. Android is an operating system not a programming language.

The case in court is not about which player is major or minor or how much profit Oracle would have made if Android did not exist. The case is about whether APIs can be copyrighted. If you are allowed to copyright APIs then you are also allowed to copyright a file format.

If they had a patent on it, it would be a different discussion but I don't see how it can be copyrighted.

Tough luck. The courts are not there to make sure one company's profits are protected at all cost. Even if it is true that Google drove them out of the mobile market, it still doesn't mean APIs can be copyrighted. The case in court is not about whether Google hurt Oracle's feelings or not.

This article highlights the main problem with theoretical physicists. They are arrogant, and lack basic understanding of proper use of language. For example, the flaw identified in the paper is not with "Emergent Gravity", but with a specific attempt at an emergent gravity theory. The flaw is with the "holographic screens" theory. Now some idiot will go around claiming that "emergent gravity" is flawed. This is just one example out of a million like this. You can find similar examples in almost every discussion about Quantum Theory -- self delusion through poor use of language, perhaps intentionally so.

Tell the guy who just got a cancer diagnosis that they should be happy because they only had a 1 in 4 chance of getting it.

If you find yourself moving, look ahead and then look behind. If it is a push, there will be more stuff behind us. if it is a pull, there will be more stuff in front of us. This is important because it is unlikely that any attractive forces are fundamental, which means all apparent attraction is simply a side-effect of repulsion. This discovery adds to the body of evidence supporting that idea. The next challenge is, we need to prove that gravity is not an attractive force but the side-effect of a more fundamental repulsive force.