Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re:Double Standard? (Score 1) 261

Is it Trump's fault if some of his supporters took aa literal approach?

As the President of the USA you have a duty to be careful in what you say (or write, or tweet) to prevent that possibility. Trump, as the least qualified presidential candidate in history, failed that duty just like he failed all others.

Comment Re:Not remembering history (Score 0) 116

Microsoft's conduct actually isn't comparable here, since Microsoft at the time had competition: they were *attempting* to create a monopoly by discouraging the use of competitors' product. But Apple already *has* a monopoly; they don't have to discourage anything, they just have to continue doing what they're doing. That is why they are far worse than Microsoft ever was, and why the axe should be swung on them sooner rather than later.

Comment Re:You don't *HAVE* to use the app store (Score 1, Insightful) 116

Apple has absolutely no obligation to developers that use its app store that they should be entitled to a so-called "fair" commission structure. The fact that many developers who might otherwise claim to be philosophically opposed to Apple's control over the apps in the app store, but are still willing to suck up the hit they take by using the App store just to have viable access to that market segment suggests to me that these developers accusing Apple of greed are actually just projecting.

I'm really intrigued at the mental gymnastics you're capable of, to be able to mutate the truth (not allegation) that Apple is greedy, into "App Store developers are greedy because they want to be paid fairly for their work". They wrote the apps, not Apple, so why should Apple get *any* cut? For setting up a monopoly that allows apps to be written ? By that "argument", Ma Bell should still own the telephone network.

Now I'm a reasonable man, so I think that Apple should get a cut for the costs of hosting, the approval process, and other expenses related to keeping the App Store working. But I'm also reasonable enough to be able to say with 100% certainty that those costs do not warrant a 30% cut in any universe. I'm willing to bet that the actual costs of hosting an app are under 1% of every paid app's revenue, which means that extra 29% is Apple getting paid for doing nothing. That seems pretty greedy to me.

Comment Re:Well duh (Score 1) 114

I'm generally opposed to drugs (and alcohol) due to their negative effects on the body and the fact they generally aren't used in a controlled way. But if they genuinely can help people when used with the help of qualified medical professionals, I'm all for them. Especially since a lot of the current drugs we have for treating mental health conditions, either have far worse side effects or simply aren't effective for too many.

Does that make me a square or not? FWIW, I also believe that the "war on drugs" is one of the most ill-conceived, puritanical, harmful wastes of time and money in all history, and that future generations will look back at it in horror.

Comment Re:Good to hear (Score 2) 114

You can make the same arguments for UBI. People who don't own their homes, who only work at crappy jobs because they need to pay rent, are under constant stress, which is incredibly unnatural - that's where so much of the current mental health crisis originates from. Yet most politicians, especially in the "Land of the Free", still refuse to consider it.

A truly happy, free populace is one with choices. If everyone knows they won't lose their home if they don't work for a shitty job, they'll refuse that job, and the person offering that job will be forced to make it less shitty - with the result that society as a whole benefits.

Governments need to stop worrying about money as their first and foremost concern, and start worrying about things that actually matter - the wellbeing of their populace first and foremost. Because happy people accomplish great things.

Comment Re: What's a native? (Score 1, Insightful) 89

The ecosystem wouldn't even notice the change

That's an incredibly confident statement to make when you have zero knowledge of the potential impact of that change. Do you really think that other species aren't bitten by those mosquitoes? Do you really think that the deaths those mosquitoes cause in said species has no effect on the ecosystem as a whole?

Slashdot Top Deals

Nothing in progression can rest on its original plan. We may as well think of rocking a grown man in the cradle of an infant. -- Edmund Burke

Working...