Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re:I must be misunderstanding (Score 1) 162

Possibly Its turning you car into a more efficient gasoline-powered vehicle.
Electric engines are efficient. Internal combustion engines less so.
So the combination of an efficient fuel cell and electric engine *may* outperform an ICE car.
Also you can still use batteries for short trips if it is a plug-in which is the dominant use case.

Comment Feasible to capture CO2 from a fuel cell (Score 1) 162

The other advantage of using a fuel cell is that it makes it feasible to capture the CO2. In an ICE because you burn the fuel the concentration of CO2 in the exhaust is low, making it impracticable/expensive to capture the CO2.
It may be possible then that when you are filling up to return the CO2, which can then be used to produce a synthetic hydrocarbon based fuel.
Major technology hurdles, but a possible route to solve both the range problem of electric vehicles and the emission problems associated with hydrocarbon fuels.

Comment Why stop there? (Score 2, Insightful) 667

Not only should the programmer learn assembler, they should also learn Operating system mechanisms. So they understand how their program is operating relative to those mechanisms. but that is not enough, they should also learn CPU design. How else are they really going to understand? Actually they really need to learn about materials science. Not enough really is it? Physics, laws of thermodynamics, electronics, quantum theory. Then when they program they will *really* know what is going on.

Alternativly they could learn more about the problem domain, so that the design better reflects the problem domain and will be more flexible in the changing environment. Nah, that really would be a waste of time.

Slashdot Top Deals

Disraeli was pretty close: actually, there are Lies, Damn lies, Statistics, Benchmarks, and Delivery dates.

Working...