Nope, those are two compilers. One transforms code into an intermediate language in which the program is expressed as a specification that contains all the functionality of the original program, i.e. is a derived work. Then another compiler takes the program in the intermediate language and creates code from it (source or binary doesn't matter). Contrary to what AI evangelists want you to believe, it does matter whether something is an automatic process or involves creative thought. Also, what's with the focus on Open Source software? You could do the exact same thing with binary code.

and here is what you have to pay to prove that you didn't use the free faking tool. These people belong in jail, or on the bottom of the sea.

AI slop feeds into AI, poisons the web and eats real resources. Turn off the servers, it's over.

20% of the reactors in Europe are completely dependent on Russian nuclear fuel (because the reactors are Soviet designs in former Soviet countries). Russia and Russia-affiliated Kazakhstan supply 40% of the world's uranium. Gotta stop buying Russian gas and oil, go nuclear?

Who gives a shit about that? Not you, if you rely on EOL nuclear power plants for most of your electricity and can't get them replaced fast enough or economically or at all.

BTW, if you're thinking, how irresponsible of me to disregard CO2 emissions: USA 384 g CO2 per kWh, at more than twice the electricity consumption per capita compared to Germany. The future for all this is wind and solar at 0 g CO2 per kWh. We're never going to do it because it's the best, so it's a good thing that it's also the cheapest.

This is an attempt to assuage the French, who are miffed because their aging nuclear power plants, for which they don't have a contingency plan, don't pass as "renewable". The french have bet the bank on nuclear, so they want money from the EU to help them with their problem. That's all this is about. Germany in particular, the only country which had a sizeable investment in nuclear and gave up on it, will not have future nuclear investments with or without von der Leyen's disregard of reality. Nuclear is too expensive, would take too long to even matter and would cause yet another dependency on foreign resources - for what? Wind and solar and batteries are so cheap already that they can't be killed by withholding subsidies. I predicted years ago that there will be at least two more rounds of handouts, once for getting back into nuclear (on paper) and once for finally getting out of it (for real).

Put more shit in the air to get shit out of the air. It couldn't be more obvious.

It's what all telecommunication equipment uses because it's the best combination of safety and efficiency. Surely it is easier just to deal with that than to negotiate voltage and hope nobody ever fucks up.

What a let-down. I was totally expecting that to be super secure.

Yeah, cobwebs. Boo us for only inventing technology.

And he's the idiot?

"Updates". If that capability surprises you, you must have found a very nice rock to live under.

They clearly have powerful drugs there.

People said that every time Microsoft decided to pull the rug out from under them, and then, when the cut-off date came, it was always quickly followed by a critical vulnerability in some core component that you can't live without and can't defend against without major loss of function. If you keep buying Microsoft, you keep paying Microsoft. Anything else is a delusion.