After I read the entire article, I couldn't help thinking: "What a jerk!"
Anyway, I'll give you my point of view, and it's really common sense.
1. With the rise of unemployment, people have more spare time to contribute (as stated)
2. When companies have no money, they tend to shift to cheaper solutions as in "open source" (been there, done that), thus increasing the number of contributors
3. Open source or "free" technology doesn't aim to replaced "paid", but simply to provide an alternative (they will co-exist)
Finally this paragraph is really intriguing:
"So how will today's brutal economic climate change the Web 2.0 "free" economy? It will result in the rise of online media businesses that reward their contributors with cash"
So he mixes two completely different concepts, weird "Web 2.0" and "free" (or open source).
Worst, he says in a scenario of crisis, businesses will have money to reward their contributors?!?
No comments...