Comment Re:Which (Score 1) 865
Principle is very simple, every animal emits CO2, every human emits CO2.
Countries like china and india are both industrialising, but dont have environmental laws as the west does, so the industrie over there is creating a relativly high amount of polution. More people leads to more consumption leads to more industrie. For example in india they burn of petroleum gas while refining crude oil. Here we drive cars running on the stuff.
Likewise forests are removed to house people, less forests means less CO2 to O2 conversion.
Yes, humans have a huge impact on the environment... More humans have a bigger impact. In a relativly short time the human population has doubled. Its stupid to think it doesnt have an impact.
But then again vulcanos exhaust a huge amount of CO2 on eruption... And of course even minke whales produce CO2, so is japan harming or helping the environment...?
In the end, there will be a balance, the climate is not in any danger... what ever happens there will be a climate, and everything will adapt to that climate....
Comment Re:I for one don't care. (Score 1) 248
Comment Re:Poor choice of verb. (Score 1) 248
Comment Where is the option for-32F (Score 1) 676
Comment Avatar brakes $1,000,000,000 at the box office (Score 1) 569
Comment Re:Google maps and satellit images do not match at (Score 1) 214
Comment Re:Can we stop with the Obama comparisons? (Score 1) 541
Also as a matter of international peace having a US President who doesn't think that bombing everything is a solution and doesn't go to war due to Biblical verses,
Yup, Bush did nothing but bomb many, many countries. Aside from fulfilling a lot of his campaign promises within his first year of office, that is. And aside from the fact that we were attacked before we went to bomb (unless you buy into conspiracy theories only when it's about a President you don't like). And aside from the fact that he actually viewed the terrorist wackos for what they really are - terrorist wackos. And besides, Obama can't seem to make up his mind about anything, not even about the war in Afghanistan that he said he supported and would finish. Unfortunately, I'm not sure he typically referred to winning, just "finishing." What I am hoping to not happen is another Vietnam.
the US invasion of Iraq was probably one of the worst choices made since Vietnam... wel actually worse than Vietnam, because Bush did know (at least should have known) what happened in Vietnam. But in case you haven't noticed, but Iraq not only already is a second Vietnam, before long you will wish it was just a second Vietnam:
1) Iraqs involvement in the 9-11 attacks were marginal at best.
2) There were no WMD.
3) US gets caught up in civil war between several parties wich only seem to agree on that the US is the bigger enemy
4) The invasion diverted forces from afghanistan, weakening the effort there.
5) The invasion fueled criticism that US wnat war against islam, further hindering efforts in afghanistan.
6) The was in Iraq is bleeding the US economy, each day the war goes on is a win for al qaeda
With no end in sight, and withdrawal would mean that the effort is wasted. Iraq is a huge sinkhole and the US is caught in it.
Comment Re:He deserves it (Score 2, Interesting) 541
In a world without internet, and distribution by phoneline driven BBS, GPL wouldn't stand a chance. So you can also point to the internet as a large contributing force to GPL
Comment Re:Google in simplified chinese... (Score 1) 214
But never let logic get in the way of a good witch hunt.