Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed


Forgot your password?
Compare cell phone plans using Wirefly's innovative plan comparison tool ×

Comment Re:I hope.... (Score 1) 88

Sorry I missed your Query. Yes the NSA, the poorly named "National Security Agency".

Where to even begin. First of all, they spy on us, and when unable to do so legally, farm it out to external resources who can. This is a clear violation of privacy rights, but more than that, has a chilling effect on free speech.

They know about software flaws that put us at risk to abuse by third parties, yet keep those hidden so that people like them can abuse those flaws to gain unauthorized access to private information and infrastructure.

They are the enemies of any person who cares about liberty and the abuse of power by individuals with deep pockets.

Comment Re:What is it that you say? (Score 3, Insightful) 445

Are the polititions going to drop the veneer of giving a shit about the public when they support the very cab companies that have done jack shit for consumers right here in boston for decades?

Everyone I know who doesn't drive, and many who do, uses these services on a regular basis, choosing them over cabs. Anyone who has taken a cab knows why.

Where was the precious regulation for YEARS when cabs were "required" to take credit cards, but regularly just drove around telling people the machine was broken. The local news was doing investigative reports about how bad the cabs were before Uber got here.

Now all of a sudden the poor cabbies who squandered their government granted monopoly for decades are crying foul and the politicians are happy to turn a blind eye to decades of disservice for a buck.

Comment Re:Any military use? (Score 1) 102

Not very usefull. Part of the issue is, they send a stream, and detect a stream, but the actual results depend on both sendinder and detector choices. Only if they are aligned do they get a definite signal, if not, its probalistic.

So your data can't match their data, because you don't know what they are measuring on each measurement. Any one of them could be bunk for you or bunk for them, and you wont know which is which, or what measurement they got when you got it wrong and they didn't.

Comment Re: I hope.... (Score 1) 88

"Fuchs's espionage likely led the U.S. to cancel a 1950 Anglo-American plan to give Britain American-made atomic bombs"

Sounds like it worked out ok. Can't think of a better plan to scuttle than warmongers sharing their toys.

Too bad the internet didn't exist so he couldn't have given this gift directly to the public.

Comment Re:Tracking (Score 1) 203

Well how else would you implement it when nobody is transmitting the data you need in most places, and, I would bet, is even resistent to doing it. As far as I can tell, most towns take steps to make this very prediction harder than it needs to be.

The article is wrong about this being "for impatient drivers", its for distracted drivers, to help them stop being total douchebags who sit at the green light.

People are already ignoring the light cycle. People are already deciding the red light is time to mess with their phone, fuck with the radio, eat a sandwich, etc. None of this is so bad, and many people even have no issue still paying attention.

However, some people, enough of the time, just fucking sit there. I don't care if this encourages people to pay less attention at the moment they rightly identified doesn't require much. I just want them to wake up on time and start moving.

If this demonstrates that this is a good thing and not a bad one, then maybe the data sources needed to do it more widely will open up. (dare to dream)

Comment Re:I hope.... (Score 1) 88

Not really. Either way I am getting what i want right? I have no qualms about paying them for the public release. Sure, I would prefer they do it for ideological reasons but, everybody needs to eat and operational costs can be real, never mind the time they put in.

I mean, why would I make such a specific assumption without any suggestion that its what they would do; esp when they say explicitly its something they wont do, even if the winning bidder asks them to, right in their FAQ, leaving the task of any release to the winner himself quite explicitly.

Plus, if you read the stratfor leaks, you would know the intelligence community has evaluated ideologues under the heading "Patriot": "A source who is betraying his country for ideological, religious, patriotic or other unreliable beliefs. Very dangerous person. He could change his mind."

So, overall, I guess you would say, I hope they are ideologues because they might change their mind and release the info anyway. However, I doubt they are, as even if they think they are, if its real, they have to know this they struck gold and that has a tendency to change motivations.

In fact, the only things I hope are not true: 1. I hope this isn't fake. 2. I hope the NSA or some other secret group doesn't win. and 3. If 1 pans out, and 2 doesn't, I hope this group is ideological enough to change their mind and release anyway.

Good news is, if it is real, it only takes one member to decide to change his mind later.... dare to dream....

Comment Re:One more on the pile. (Score 1) 102

Well...just look at the current culture of web browsing and you have your answer. All you really need is a lack of sexual taboo and no awareness of sexually transmitted disease; which is pretty much the case for most web users and what their browsers do.

A man ejaculating in your ass _is_ leaving executable code behind. No different from when your browser blindly loads scripts from any site pointed to. All a virus is, biologically, is a form of automated root kit.

It really is a perfect analogy for every day pc use.

Comment One more on the pile. (Score 4, Insightful) 102

Once again proven that browsing the web is like going to a diner party in a world where the handshake has been replaced with unprotected anal sex.

Sure, many people you meet may be offended when you insist on a condom (plugins like requestpolicy, and noscript) and say its some right of theirs to not let you sit at their table because of it, or rant on about how they need to get paid....

but at the end of the day.... its basic security. Loading and running code from random third party sites is not safe. It doesn't matter if its inside a restricted environment, its a risk. Its a risk website owners are in the habbit of irresponsibly magnifying for all of their viewers without a second thought

You should protect yourself. Wear condoms unless you really know your partner. Get some here:

If you have a browser other than firefox, you will need something else, I don't know what they are but, bottom line...protect yourself.

Slashdot Top Deals

"Don't tell me I'm burning the candle at both ends -- tell me where to get more wax!!"