Become a fan of Slashdot on Facebook

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
The Internet

Knol, the Wikipedia Maybe-Fork? 102

Bennett Haselton contributes the following essay on the consequences of license choice as it applies to sites based on user contributions; read on below for more of his big idea for making Knol a more useful resource. "Google Knol should allow its writers to publish under a Creative Commons Share Alike license. The preceding sentence may not mean much to you, but if you've ever wanted to cite a Wikipedia article as a source, or simply read a Wikipedia article with some assurance that someone wasn't pulling your leg with some creative editing, or if you've wanted to contribute to Wikipedia but couldn't afford the time unless you received some modest compensation for it, then the addition of this one simple feature to Knol might make all the difference." (More below.)

Comment Mod parent up (Score 1) 541

mod this up, I agree wholeheartedly.

If you haven't noticed the proliferation of the CC licenses recently, you haven't been on the web. This is happening because it's an identifiable mark, a simple concept, and the options are easy to understand. If you can get something like this, it should go like Go Dog Go!

Slashdot Top Deals

The universe is an island, surrounded by whatever it is that surrounds universes.

Working...