FTA:

(emphasis added)

While we all crack wise about the bizarro planet of our science fiction dreams, it bears pointing out that the point of the program is ostensibly to find other inhabitable planets--that is, potential sites for future human expansion, rather than other inhabited planets. The difference between the two is not insignificant, and is a nod to the somewhat conservative view that while it may prove impossible to find another planet like the Earth where life has evolved concurrently with our own, it is nevertheless very realistic to search for another planet like the Earth where life could thrive.

The major problem with pesticides, you see, is that they were designed to kill things.

And you make the assumption that every single piece of meat on shelves will be the clone of just one animal. Even if one cow provides 1,000 clones, it is unlikely that you or anybody could be eating the same cow over and over.

Also, nowhere in the summary or in the full article does it say that labelling the meat as being cloned or not would be prohibited, just that it would not be required. So... no fascism here. That was a pretty quick enactment of Godwin's, though.