Comment Re:Respecting copyright is an important part of FO (Score 1) 109
Happens I know both SCO's Expert and IBM's Expert. They both independently analyzed the codebases, each developing a similar set of analysis tools (think of a modified version of grep which searches for similarities in code patterns that remain after changing variable names and re-factoring equations to do the same math in more or fewer lines.)
Both researchers reached the same conclusion - the code which was the same in both systems was free to use - open source and MIT licensed (primarily code that was taken from the BSD source tree.) SCO's Expert went to the legal team and said that there was no stolen code, but that IBM likely had violated their obligations to the UNIX trademark by diluting its value when they put their weight behind Linux. The SCO legal team didn't feel that was a path forward, and continued to pretend there was stolen code.