Comment Re:Requires? RTFEO (Score 1) 42
Good to see you read the Executive Order.
Me thinks you doth protest too much. I showed you the entire executive order. You have not even seen the form you find it impossible to fill out in good conscience. And you claim that after evaluating the scientific risk versus reward, that it is not a matter of conscience to protect your daughter based upon your conclusion, yea or nay. It obviously is a matter of conscience whether you prefer your daughter to be exposed to a risk of innoculation and a decreased risk of cancer, or no risk of innoculation and an increased risk of cancer. But these are statistics only, so the question always becomes, "Do you feel lucky?" Well... to a certain age, the health care decisions are yours, by your conscience.
But I never expected you to give an inch.
Science gives you facts, many of which are tendencies of populations. But it has never been good at predicting the next roll of the dice, or what will happen to your daughter.
And you skip the whole point of my post, which is that this is not required. NOT REQUIRED. So please stop saying that it is required. No one will be going down the classroom halls with an injection gun and checking your papers. And you don't even live in Texas, dude. If you lived in Texas and your daughter went into the sixth grade of a public school and you refuse to take any action as to your objections of (science/conscience), yes, something will be required for your daughter because of your lack of action and your definition of conscience- but not an injection- which you know is not at all what they mean. They will kick her out of school! But they already gave you a way to opt out that you interpret so as to refuse and pick a fight. They don't want to go to court because you insist they are harming your daughter or forcing you to harm her- and the dictates of your conscience- so they do provide a way to avoid it. I imagine the Judge would have a good chuckle at you, they see all kinds.
And I bet most of the vaccine people are having their daughters innoculated- not to profit their company, but by the dictates of their conscience.
I suppose this post is too long for you to give a thorough coherent response to, but what the hell, it is on the record.
Me thinks you doth protest too much. I showed you the entire executive order. You have not even seen the form you find it impossible to fill out in good conscience. And you claim that after evaluating the scientific risk versus reward, that it is not a matter of conscience to protect your daughter based upon your conclusion, yea or nay. It obviously is a matter of conscience whether you prefer your daughter to be exposed to a risk of innoculation and a decreased risk of cancer, or no risk of innoculation and an increased risk of cancer. But these are statistics only, so the question always becomes, "Do you feel lucky?" Well... to a certain age, the health care decisions are yours, by your conscience.
But I never expected you to give an inch.
Science gives you facts, many of which are tendencies of populations. But it has never been good at predicting the next roll of the dice, or what will happen to your daughter.
And you skip the whole point of my post, which is that this is not required. NOT REQUIRED. So please stop saying that it is required. No one will be going down the classroom halls with an injection gun and checking your papers. And you don't even live in Texas, dude. If you lived in Texas and your daughter went into the sixth grade of a public school and you refuse to take any action as to your objections of (science/conscience), yes, something will be required for your daughter because of your lack of action and your definition of conscience- but not an injection- which you know is not at all what they mean. They will kick her out of school! But they already gave you a way to opt out that you interpret so as to refuse and pick a fight. They don't want to go to court because you insist they are harming your daughter or forcing you to harm her- and the dictates of your conscience- so they do provide a way to avoid it. I imagine the Judge would have a good chuckle at you, they see all kinds.
And I bet most of the vaccine people are having their daughters innoculated- not to profit their company, but by the dictates of their conscience.
I suppose this post is too long for you to give a thorough coherent response to, but what the hell, it is on the record.
