Comment Re:Time for free legal care and a single payer in (Score 3, Informative) 17
It's kinda funny but this case sort of shows the opposite. Javice effectively had infinite money to hire lawyers because JPMorgan was footing the entire bill. So they spent 75 million hiring tons of the most expensive lawyers they could find. In the end, they still lost because the facts of the case were too far out of their favor.
I say this only sort of show the opposite because the situation means Javice only had access to millions of dollars if it was spent on legal fees. If they had their own unrestricted billions to spend, I'm sure less above the board means to victory start to open up.