Using an insecure OS that nobody cares about is NOT security. dumbass.

Maybe linux will break .8% of the market with this groundbreaking advance.. *snicker*

come up with a 7failure tag and apply it? I mean, Win7 has 0 market share, so why not? Fuckin retards...

I've run Vista on less than 1GB (512MB) and it ran fine. Vista used 800MBs on your system, because vista adjusts its memory usage based on how much memory is in the system. I think I had 400MBs used on the 512MB system, enough for simple IE sessions and a little quicken which is all the client required.

Ya, after all it's not like the biggest and most visited sites on the internet (like amazon.com, microsoft.com, etc.) run off of IIS. Oh, wait.

You must be new here..just a hint, /. is nothing but a bunch of hypocritical punk kids, just agree with the hive before you get modded troll.

You also know it is responsible for love, beauty, laughter, family, good times, music, art, poetry, etc. etc. so why even post that bs? You are nothing but a misery hustler, if you believe things are really that bad than go jump off a bridge and leave the rest of us to be 'miserable.'

Why are you spouting off about things you have no understanding of? Computer chips have followed Moore's law since the inception of the Integrated Circuit, causing computational power to double every year and a half or so per cost. Because of this, next year a japanese company is planning to make a computer with the same computational power as the human brain (10 petaflops), http://blogs.sun.com/HPC/entry/japan_to_build_10_petaflop, and it is NOT 100 billion nodes with ~7000 network cards per node, not even close, you are off by so many orders of magnitude it's not even funny. How can you be so clueless and still feel compelled to spout off about something? sheesh. Anyway, every year after that computers will get 2x as fast for the money, until machines hit nanoscale with atomic precision at which point you will have suger cube shaped computers with 100 million times the power of a human brain. This has nothing to do with how many 'nodes' of computers you have on undefined process tech, etc. So please stop making up bullshit to push agendas for no logical reason.

Depends on the manufacturing process. Built with Pentium-66 chips, probably like a petawatt. Build out of efficient nanocomputers, thousands or millions of times less power than a human brain.

MS has sold over 200 million copies of Vista, so you are clueless when you say old versions of windows are killing newer versions. Vista adoption is also higher than XP adoption, even when put into relative market share terms. MS also sells more Vista licenses in a month than Linux users total, just keep that in mind when you regurgitate your lame anti-windows chestnuts thinking everyone will find you cute.

You were born brain damaged, right?