Comment Re:I was one of the lucky few (Score 4, Informative) 205
I've also got a beta account on Google pages, and am a web designer. The HTML it creates is passable, but not good. It can't touch the horror that MS Word creates (but what could?), but it still uses tags, which I find a bit odd.
You can manipulate the raw code, but it's not set up in a way that would encourage the average user to do so.
Overall, I found it a comparable product to the other basic WYSIWYG web building tools that have been online for years...a cleaner interface (a la Google, they do that well), but really nothing new.
It's easy to use though. One needn't know so much as how a site is structured in order to build a site, and linking between pages is pretty intuitive. There doesn't seem to be any way to see an overall structure of the site you're creating though. You can end up just building and adding pages from here, there any everwhere, but never having the benefit of seeing a site or file structure to keep architecture in check.
That said, I suspect that most of the people who use this product will be building little site...a few pages...and don't have big demands for advanced features.